期刊文献+

肩袖撕裂双排和单排固定的优势比较 被引量:1

Comparison of the advantage of double and single row fixation in the treatment of rotator cuff tear
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析肩袖撕裂双排和单排固定的优势。方法:收治肩袖撕裂损伤患者20例,平分为两组。A组采用单排固定治疗技术,B组患者采用双排固定治疗技术,比较两种治疗方法在术后6个月随访下的临床效果。结果:B组患者的前屈活动度、肩关节外展、肩关节内旋等方面评分进行比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:双排固定治疗技术对于肩袖撕裂的临床效果显著。 Objective:To analyze the advantage of double and single row fixation in the treatment of rotator cuff tear.Methods:20patients with rotator cuff tear were selected.They were divided into the two groups on average.The A group using single rowfixation technique,while the B group was treated with double row fixation technology.We compared the clinical effects of twotreatments at 6 months of follow-up.Results:The scores of flexion range,abduction of the shoulder joint,shoulder internal rotationwere compared in the patients of the Group B,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinicaleffect of double row fixation in the treatment of rotator cuff tear is significant.
作者 黄榆顺 李恩超 周文忠 程彪 孙健 Huang Yushun;Li Enchao;Zhou Wenzhong;Cheng Biao;Sun Jian(Department of Orthopedics,Zong Renqing Memorial Hospital,Kunshan 215300;The Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University,Shanghai 200072)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2016年第28期62-62,64,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 肩袖撕裂 双排固定 单排固定 Rotator cuff tear Double row fixation Single row fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献71

  • 1Kim DH,ElAttrache NS,Tibone JE,et al.Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair[J].Am J Sports Med,2006,34:407-414.
  • 2Mazzoc.ca AD,Millett PJ,Guanche CA,et al.Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair[J].Am J Sports Med,2005,33:1861- 1868.
  • 3Ma CB,Cumerford L,Wilson J,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs:double-row compared to single- row fixation[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88:403-410.
  • 4Wall LB,Keener JD,Brophy RH.Double-row vs single-row rotator cuff repair:a review of the biomechanical evidence[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2009,18:933-941.
  • 5Nho SJ,Slabaugh MA,Seroyer ST,et al.Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single- row suture anchor configuration[J].Arthroscopy,2009,25; 1319- 1328.
  • 6Wall LB,Keener JD,Brophy RH.Clinical outcomes of double- row versus single-row rotator cuff repairs[J].Arthroscopy,2009,25:1312-1318.
  • 7DeHaan AM,Axelrad TW,Kaye E,et al.Does double-row rotator cuff repair improve functional outcome of patients compared with single-row technique? A systematic review[J].Am J Sports Med,2012,40:1176- 1185.
  • 8Franceschi F,Ruzzini L,Longo UG,et al.Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears:a randomized controlled trial[J].Am J Sports Med,2007,35; 1254- 1260.
  • 9Grasso A,Milano G,Salvatore M,et al.Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair:a prospective randomized clinical study[J].Arthroscopy,2009,25:4 -12.
  • 10Burks RT,Crim J,Brown N,et al.A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair:magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation[J].Am J Sports Med,2009,37:674-682.

共引文献32

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部