期刊文献+

Quadrant通道下微创腰椎后路融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病 被引量:2

Treatment of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion via Quadrant channel for single-segment degenerative lumbar spine diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Quadrant通道下微创腰椎后路融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2014年11月至2016年3月南京医科大学附属苏州医院收治的12例单节段腰椎退行性疾病的临床资料,所有患者均在Quadrant通道下经多裂肌与最长肌间隙行微创腰椎后路融合手术。其中腰椎后路椎体间融合10例、腰椎后外侧融合2例。记录手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后血红蛋白水平,以及术前、末次随访时疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。结果手术时间120~260min,平均手术时间180min;术中出血量50~800mL,平均术中出血量375mL;术后引流量8~321mL,平均引流量128mL;术后血红蛋白水平93~138g/L,平均血红蛋白水平113g/L。所有患者无脑脊液漏、神经根损伤、感染及术后顽固性腰背痛发生。随访5~21个月(平均16个月),术前、术后末次随访VAS评分和ODI分别为(6.4±1.0)、(2.0±0.7)分和(18±4)、(46±10)分,手术前后比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论Quadrant通道下经多裂肌与最长肌间隙入路行腰椎后路融合手术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病具有出血少、对后方韧带破坏小、脊柱稳定性好、功能恢复快等优点,符合微创理念,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbodyfusion via Quadrant channel in the treatment of single-segment degenerative diseases of lumbar spine. MethodsTwelve patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases treated in Suzhou Affiliated Hospital ofNanjing Medical University from November 2014 to March 2016 were included in the study, who underwentminimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion via the gap of multifidus muscle and the longest muscleunder Quadrant channel, including 10 patients with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and 2 patients with posterolateral fusion. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage volume, postoperative hemoglobin level, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score andOswestry disability index (ODI) before and after the surgery were recorded. Results Operation time was 120 to260 min, with an average of 180 min. Intraoperative blood loss was 50 to 800 mL (average, 375 mL).Postoperative drainage volume was 8 to 321 mL (average, 128 mL). The hemoglobin level was 93 to 138 g/L,and the mean value was 113 g/L. No cerebrospinal fluid leakage, nerve root injury, infection or intractable lowback pain was found in all patients. After 5 to 21 month' follow-up (average, 10 months), the average score ofVAS and ODI was (2.0 ± 0.7) points and (46 ± 10) points, showed improvement compared with preoperative (6.4± 1.0) points and (18 ± 4 points). The differences between preoperation and the last follow-up had statisticalsignificance (P <0.05). Conclusion For single-segment degenerative lumbar spine diseases, posterior lumbarinterbody fusion via the gap of multifidus muscle and the longest muscle under Quadrant channel has theadvantages of less blood loss, less damage to the posterior ligaments, better spinal stability, faster postoperativerecovery, which is consistent with minimally invasive concept and worthy of clinical application.
作者 王烨锋 邹天明 WANG Yefeng;ZOU Tianming(Department of Orthopedics, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215002, China)
出处 《中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志》 2016年第5期304-308,共5页 Chinese Orthopaedic Journal of Clinical and Basic Research
关键词 腰椎 脊柱疾病 脊柱融合术 外科手术 微创性 QUADRANT通道 Lumbar vertebrae Spinal diseases Spinal fusion Surgical procedures, minimally invasive Quadrant channel
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献34

  • 1Chan CW, Peng P. Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med. 2011 ;12(4):577-606.
  • 2Watkins MB. Posterolateral bonegrafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959; 41-A(3):388-396.
  • 3Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al, The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50(5):919-926.
  • 4Wiltse LL, Spencer CWo New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1988;13(6):696-706.
  • 5Vialle R, Court C, Khouri N, et al. Anatomical study of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(4):366-371.
  • 6Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain 0, et al. The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:175-180.
  • 7Olivier E, Beldame J, Ould Slimane M, et at, Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study. Surg Radiol Ana!. 2006;28(5):494-497.
  • 8Palmer OK, Allen JL, Williams PA, et al. Multilevel magnetic resonance imaging analy~is of multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine and potential clinical applications to Wiltse's paraspinal approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2011;36(16):1263-1267.
  • 9Waschke A, Hartmann C, Walter J, et al. Denervation and atrophy of paraspinal muscles after open lumbar interbody fusion is associated with clinical outcome--electromyographic and CT-volumetric investigation of 30 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014; 156(2):235-244.
  • 10Bresnahan LE, Smith JS, Ogden AT, et at, Assessment of Paraspinal Muscle Cross-Sectional Area Following Lumbar Decompression: Minimally Invasive versus Open Approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Oct 13.

共引文献30

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部