两种改良包皮环切术临床疗效对比

Comparison of clinical effects of two modified circumcision

目的:探讨改良后的一次性包皮环切器包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术的临床疗效比较。方法:收治280例患者包皮环切术患者,分为改良包皮环切器组(n=150)与改良传统组(n=130)。结果:两组手术时间、治疗费用、切口愈合时间、术后水肿情况差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);出血量、术后切口裂开、切口感染率、切口出血情况及术后满意度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:应根据患者的不同情况,选择合适的方法,达到最佳效果。

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of improved disposable circumcision device circumcision and traditional circumcision.Methods:280 patients of circumcision were selected.They were divided into the improved disposable circumcision device circumcision group with 150 cases and the traditional circumcision group with 130 cases.Results:The differences of operation time,cost of treatment,incision healing time,and postoperative edema between groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The differences of blood loss,postoperative incision dehiscence,incision infection rate,incision bleeding and postoperative satisfaction between groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion:According to the patients' different conditions,choose the appropriate method to achieve the best results.