期刊文献+

根本原因分析法在护生针刺伤事件分析中的应用 被引量:2

Application of root cause analysis method in the analysis of needle stick injuries in nursing students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:本文利用根本原因分析法(RCA)分析针刺伤事件1例。确定该事件为"实习同学针刺伤事件"。直接原因为护生操作不熟练,拔出头皮针时太用力,头皮针靠近肝素帽边缘。根本原因为培训不到位、防护意识差,带教老师强调不足,未告知拔出头皮针环节注意事项,未使用无针接头输液器。制定了改善方案。规范留置针操作培训,加强护生针刺伤的培训,提高防护意识,可有效预防护生针刺伤事件的发生。 The root cause analysis method(RCA)was used to analyze 1 case of needle stick injuries in this paper.Determine the incident as"internship classmate needle stick injury event".The direct reason is that the nursing students are not skilled in operation,pull out the scalp needle too hard,and the scalp needle is close to the edge of the heparin cap.The root cause is that the training is not in place,and the protection consciousness is poor,with a teacher shortage stressed,did not inform the pin pulled scalp links precautions,unused needle-free connector infusion.We developed a plan for improvement.To standardize the operation training of retaining needle,strengthen the training of nursing students' needle stick injury,raise the awareness of protection,which can effectively prevent the occurrence of needle stick injuries.
作者 胡远丽 Hu Yuanli(Department of Endocrinology,People's Hospital of Deyang City 618000)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2016年第32期161-161,163,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 根本原因分析法 针刺伤 护生 Root cause analysis Needle stick injury Nursing students
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1Jane Perry, Ginger Parker, Janine Jagger. EPINet report:2007 percutaneous injury rates, http:/faealthsystem.virgina.edu/intemet/ epinet/rates.cfm, 2009.
  • 2Preboth M. Prevention of needle stiekinjuries. Am Fam Physicion, 2000, 61(5): 1558.
  • 3Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, et al. A pharmacist-led infor- mation technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER) : a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effective- ness analysis[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9823) : 1310-1319.
  • 4Poon EG, Keohaue CA, Yoon CS, et al. Effect of bar-code tech- nology on the safety of medication administration [J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(18) : 1698-1707.
  • 5Shane R. Current status of administration of medicines [ J ]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2009, 66 (5 Suppl 3 ) : S42-S48.
  • 6Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of ad- verse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group [ J ]. JAMA, 1995, 274(1) : 35-43.
  • 7Husch M, Sullivan C, Rooney D, et al. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors : implications for infusion pump technology[J]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2005, 14(2) : 80-86.
  • 8Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ. ASHP national sur- vey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: dispensing and ad- ministration--2011 [ J ]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2012, 69 (9) : 768-785.
  • 9Rothschild JM, Keohane CA, Cook EF, et al. A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients[J].Crit Care Med, 2005, 33 (3) : 533-540.
  • 10National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. NCC MERP index [ EB/OL ]. ( 2001-02-20 ) [ 2013- 03-23]. http://www, nccmerp, org/types-medication-errors.

共引文献10

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部