论侦查中情态证据的运用与风险防控

The Use of Demeanor Evidence and Its Risk Prevention and Control

现代司法理性主义以证据"客观、具体、可描述性"作为其本质特征,并通过对证据的语言描述来实现其自身的诉讼价值。然而,语言描述只是证据表现形式的一部分,由于现代庭审往往对非语言性描述的证据嗤之以鼻,侦查过程也由于重口供的传统证据模式而忽视情态证据等非语言性证据的重要性,导致案件事实被曲解,乃至冤假错案发生。随着司法体制改革的深入,情态作为一种沉默性语言理应受到立法者的重视并着重体现在证据制度构建中。

Modem judicid rationalism use the “objective, specific, descriptive” evidence as its essentialcharacter, and through the language description of evidence to achieve its o w n lawsuit worth. However, thelanguage description is only one part of the evidence manifestations. Modern trial often despise thenon-verbal descriptive evidence, and the criminal investigation often ignores the importance of non-verbaldescriptive evidence because of the confession centrism, leading to the misinterpretation of facts and theoccurrence of miscarriages of justice. With the judicial system reforming, demeanor evidence as a silencelanguage should be paid attention and reflected the emphasis in the construction of evidence system.