期刊文献+

中药芫花用于中期引产的临床研究 被引量:2

Clinical research on flos genkwa in induction of labor in second trimester
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨中药芫花用于中期引产的临床疗效和安全性。方法:我院从2015年1月—2015年12月,采用中药芫花对231例处于妊娠中期要求引产而无心、肝、肾等主要脏器并发症的孕妇实施引产。其中经产妇157例,初产妇74例。年龄17~46岁,平均年龄31.5岁。结果:引产中期妊娠231例中,引产成功228例,成功率为98.7%。2例患者有软产道损伤,无大出血、感染、过敏等其他不良反应及并发症发生。结论:芫花用于中期引产,方法简便,引产时间短,安全有效,值得临床特别是基层医院推广应用。 Objective: To explore the clinical effect and safety of flos genkwa in induction of labor in second trimester. Methods:From January 2015 to December 2015, 231 cases of induction of labour in second trimester were made by using flos genkwa, among whom 157 cases were pregnant women and 74 cases were primipara, all of them had no heart, liver and kidney complications. There age was 17~46 years and the average was 31.5 years. Results: Out of 231 cases, 228 were successful in induction of labor and the success rate was 98.7%. 2 cases suffered laceration of birth canal and there was no reverse actions such as bleeding, infection, allergy and other complications. Conclusion: Flos genkwa was effective in induction of labor in second trimester, it could shorten the induction time and was safe, it was worthy of clinical promotion and application in primary hospitals.
作者 迟春梅
机构地区 即墨市中医医院
出处 《中医临床研究》 2016年第27期141-142,共2页 Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词 中期引产 芫花 中药疗法 Induction of labor in second trimester Flos genkwa Traditional Chinese medicine therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Mitchell EM, Kwizera A, Usta M, et al. Choosing early pregnancy ter- mination methods in Urban Mozambique [J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2010,71 ( 1 ): 62-70.
  • 2Renner RM, Brahmi D, Kapp N. Who can provide effective and safe termination of pregnancy care? A systematic review[J]. B JOG: An In- ternational Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2013,120(I):23-31.
  • 3Say L, Kulier R, Gulmezoglu M, et al. Medical versus surgical meth- ods for first trimester termination of pregnancy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002,4:CD003037.
  • 4Chan Y, Ho P, Ma H. Blood loss in termination of early pregnancy byvacuum aspiration and by combination of mifepristone and gemeprost [J]. Contraception, 1993,47(1):85-95.
  • 5Grimes DA. Medical abortion in early pregnancy: a i'eview of the evi- dence[J]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997,89(5, Part 1):790-796.
  • 6Niinimiki M, Pouta A, Bloigu A, et al. Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy [J]. Obstet- rics & Gynecology, 2009,114(4):795-804.
  • 7Westfall JM, Sophocles A, Burggraf H, et al. Manual vacuum aspira- tion for first-trimester abortion [J]. Archives of family medicine, 1998,7:559-562.
  • 8Hemlin J, Mtller B. Manual vacuum aspiration, a safe and effective alternative in early pregnancy termination[J]. Acta obstetricia et gyne- cologica Scandinavica, 2001,80(6):563-567.
  • 9Winikoff B. Acceptability of medical abortion in early pregnancy [J]. Family Planning Perspectives, 1995:142-185.
  • 10Rodriguez M, Seuc A, Kapp N, et al. Acceptability ofmisoprostol only medical termination of pregnancy compared with vacuum aspira- tion: an international, multicentre trial [J]. B JOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012,119(7): 817-823.

共引文献2

同被引文献56

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部