2Hull IV R B.Measurement of scenic beauty:the law ofcomparative judgement and scienic beauty estimation procedures[J].For Sci,1984,30 (4):1084-1096.
3Hull IV R B,Buhyoff G J.The scenic beauty temporal distribution method:An attempt tomake scenic beauty assessment compatible with forest planning efforts[J].For Sci,1986,32 (2):271 -286.
4BuhyoffG J,Leuschner W A,Arndt L K.Replication of a scenic preference function[J].For Sci,1980,26 (2):227-230.
5Hull IV R B,Buhyoff G J,Gordell H K.Psychophysical models:an example with scenic beauty perceptions of roodside pine forests[J].Landsc J,1987,6 (2):113-122.
6Buhyoff G J,Leuschner W A.Estimation psychological disutility from damaged forest stands[J].For Sci,1978,24 (1):424-432.
7B uhyoff G J,Gauthier L J,Wellman J D.Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurement[J].For Sci,1984 (30):71-82.
8Tips W E J.Savasdisara.The influence of the environmental background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluation[J].Landsc Urban Planning,1986 (13):125-133.
9Hull IV R B. Measurement of sc.enic beauty : the law of comparative judgement and scienic beauty estimation procedures [J].Forest Science, 1984,30(4) : 1084 - 1096.
10Hull IV R B,Buhyoff G J. The scenic beauty temporal distribution method: An attempt tomake scenic beauty assessment compatible with forest planning efforts [ J ]. Forest Science, 1986,32 ( 2 ) : 271 - 286.
