期刊文献+

面向AltaRica模型的嵌入式系统安全性验证方法 被引量:1

Safety Verification Methodology of Embedded System Based on AltaRica Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 嵌入式系统在航空、航天、交通等安全关键领域的使用愈加广泛,Alta Rica是一种描述安全关键系统的建模语言,同时基于Alta Rica模型的安全性分析已成为欧洲的工业标准。提出了一种面向Alta Rica模型的嵌入式系统安全性验证方法,包括:使用Alta Rica语言对嵌入式系统进行建模;给出Alta Rica模型到Promela模型的转换规则;对转换规则进行形式化证明,得到嵌入式系统的Promela模型;使用模型检验工具SPIN进行安全性验证。通过机轮刹车系统中的机轮刹车控制单元进行实例分析,验证了转换规则的正确性和有效性。 As the embedded system is widely used in the safety-critical fields such as aeronautics, astronautics and transportation, AltaRica is a kind of formal modeling languages for safety- critical systems. Modeling critical systems based on AltaRica model and the safety analysis upon this have become the industrial standard in Europe. This paper proposes a kind of embedded system safety verification method based on AltaRica model, which includes,firstly model the embedded system using AltaRica, then exhibit the transformation rules from AltaRica model to Promela model, at the same time do formal proofs on transformation rules, so as to acquire the Promela model ofembedded system, and finally use SPIN, a model check tool, to analyze and verify it. This paper takes the control unit of wheel brake system as an example to verify this transformation rules and method.
作者 仵志鹏 胡军 陈松 石娇洁 WU Zhipeng;HU Jun;CHEN Song;SHI Jiaojie(College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)
出处 《计算机科学与探索》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期24-36,共13页 Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划) 教育部回国留学人员科研启动基金 南京航空航天大学青年科技创新基金~~
关键词 嵌入式系统 安全性验证 AltaRica模型 Promela模型 embedded system safety verification AltaRica model Promela model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献54

  • 1蒋严冰,邵维忠,张路,麻志毅.UML中衍型的精确定义与分析[J].电子学报,2003,31(z1):2101-2105. 被引量:3
  • 2胡军,于笑丰,张岩,李宣东,郑国梁.基于场景构件式实时软件设计的一致性检验[J].软件学报,2006,17(1):48-58. 被引量:13
  • 3Daskaya I, Huhn M, Milius S. Formal safety analysis in industrial practice. In: Proe. of the 16th Int'l Workshop on. Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS 2011). LNCS 6959, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011. 68-84. [doi: 10.1007/978-3- 642-24431-57].
  • 4Bukowski JV. Defining mean time-to failure in a particular failure-state for multi-failure-state systems. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2001,50(2):221-228. [doi: 10.1109/24.963132].
  • 5Magott J, Skrobanek P. Timing analysis of safety properties using fault trees with time dependencies and timed state-charts. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2012,97(1): 14-26. [doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.004].
  • 6Kaiser B, Gramlich C, Forster M. State/Event fault trees--A safety analysis model for software-controlled systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007,92(11 ): 1521 - 1537. Idol: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.010].
  • 7Elmqvist J, Nadjm-Tehrani S. Safety-Oriented design of component assemblies using safety interfaces. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2007,182(29):57-72. [doi: 10.1016/j.entcs.2006.09.031 ].
  • 8Kaiser B. State/Event trees: A safety and reliability analysis technique for software controlled systems [Ph.D. Thesis]. Kaiserslautern: Universit/it Kaiserslautern, 2007.
  • 9Grunske L, Kaiser B, Papadopoulos Y. Model-Driven safety evaluation with state-event-based component failure annotations. In: Proc, of the 8th Int'l Symp. on Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE 2005). LNCS 3489, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005. 33-48. [doi: 10.1007/11424529_3].
  • 10Bryant RE. Graph-Based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 1986,100(8):677-691. Idol: 10 1109/TC.1986.1676819].

共引文献73

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部