摘要
商家"最终解释权"是一种附带性义务的权利。经成本—收益权衡比较可知,"最终解释权"归商家所有,其收益大于成本,只要商家合理行使、认真履行附带性义务、不违背有效性标准,商家"最终解释权"条款就是有益的。目前法律法规对商家"最终解释权"规制与引导的规定缺失,为此应在《合同法》《消费者权益保护法》以及《关于处理侵害消费者权益行为的若干规定》中通过增设或修改相关条款的方式对其加以完善。
The final interpretation is a right with incidental obligations. By the cost-benefit comparison,a conclusion is drawn that businesses obtain the rights of final interpretation, and their benefits faroutweigh the costs. As long as businesses exercise rights and fulfill incidental obligations without prejudice to the validity, the rights of final interpretation are helpful. Currently, we are short of laws and regulations to rule and guide the rights of final interpretation of business. Therefore, it is necessary to improve legislation through adding or modifying relevant clauses in Contract Law? Consumer's Interest Protection Law, and Regulations on Handling Behaviors against the Interests of Consumers
作者
胡家强
赵雪梅
Hu Jiaqiang;Zhao Xuemei(School of Law and Political Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100,China)
出处
《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2016年第6期92-96,共5页
Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金
山东社科规划项目"预付费交易法律规制研究"(13CFXJ09)阶段性研究成果
关键词
“最终解释权”
附带性义务
经济分析方法
立法完善
right of final interpretation of business
incidental obligations
economic analysis method
improving legislation