期刊文献+

全胸腔镜下与传统食管切除术治疗食管癌的疗效对比分析 被引量:5

Comparative analysis of the curative effect of totally thoracoscopic surgery and traditional esophageal resection in the treatment of esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨全胸腔镜下与传统食管切除术治疗食管癌的疗效。方法:收治食管癌患者86例,随机分为研究组和对照组,对照组采用传统食管切除术治疗,研究组采用全胸腔镜手术治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果:研究组手术时间、术中出血量、胃肠道功能恢复时间、24 h引流量和并发症发生率明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:全胸腔镜手术治疗食管癌的效果显著。 Objective:To explore the curative effect of totally thoracoscopic surgery and traditional esophageal resection in the treatment of esophageal cancer.Methods:86 patients with esophageal cancer were selected.They were randomly divided into the study group and the control group.The control group was treated with traditional esophageal resection.The study group was treated by totally thoracoscopic surger.We compared the therapeutic effect of two groups.Results:In the study group,the operation time,amount of bleeding during operation,gastrointestinal function recovery time,24 hours volume of drainage and complication rate were significantly better than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of total thoracic surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer was significant.
作者 吕建发 Lv Jianfa(The People's Hospital of Hanchuan City,Hubei Province 431600)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2017年第3期37-37,39,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 全胸腔镜 传统食管切除术 食管癌 Totally thoracoscopic surgery Traditional esophageal resection Esophageal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1朱成楚,陈仕林,叶中瑞,郭剑波,叶敏华,马德华,叶加洪.电视胸腔镜下食管癌切除及疗效分析(附120例报道)[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2006,22(6):364-365. 被引量:37
  • 2Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg, 2010, 252 : 292-298.
  • 3Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 opera- tions. Ann Surg, 2008, 248: 1081-1091.
  • 4Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg, 2009, 35: 13-21.
  • 5Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, et al. Comparison of the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal canc- er after subtotal esophageetomy via video-assisted thoraeo- scopie or open surgery. Dis Esophagus, 2010, 23 : 408- 414.
  • 6Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012,379(9829) : 1887-1892. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736( 12)60516-9.
  • 7Cuesta MA, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Randomised trial, Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy versus open oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2012,4(5) :462,464. DOI: 10.3978/ j.issn.2072-1439.2012.08.12.
  • 8Goldberg RF, Bowers SP, Parker M, et al. Technical and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position [J]. Surg Endosc, 2013,27 (2) : 553-557. DOI : 10.1007/s00464-012-2479-x.
  • 9Schwameis K, Ba-Ssalamah A, Wrba F, et al. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center [ J ]. Anticancer Res, 2013,33(5) :2085-2091.
  • 10Smithers BM, Gofley DC, Martin I, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy [J]. Ann Surg. 2007.245(2):232-240.

共引文献78

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部