摘要
文章基于建设条件与设计经验筛选出了斜坡式与直立式两种结构方案,并分别进行了结构设计,通过物理模型试验进行波浪特性分析,从两方案的泊稳条件、工程造价、结构稳定进行比较。结果表明,两方案均满足港池泊稳条件以及码头作业天数要求,而直立堤结构方案的造价比斜坡堤方案造价低。相关结论可供类似深水重力式海港码头与引堤衔接段结构设计参考。
Based on the construction conditions and design experience, we selected two kinds of structure schemes, slope type and upright type, and carried out structure design respectively, then established the physical model test for wave characteristics analysis, compared berthing conditions, engineering cost, structural stability of the two schemes. The conclusion shows that the two schemes can meet the requirements of berthing stability and the work days of wharfs in the harbor. The cost of the upright embankment structure scheme is lower than that of the slope embankment. Related conclusions can be used for reference on the design of similar projects of the connecting segment between deep-water gravity seaport and embankment.
作者
刘潜兵
柏龙武
LIU Qian-bing;BAI Long-wu(CCCC Second Harbor Consultants Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China)
出处
《中国港湾建设》
2017年第2期58-64,共7页
China Harbour Engineering
关键词
结构设计
直立式沉箱
波浪力
物理试验
泊稳条件
抗滑、抗倾稳定
structure design
vertical caisson
wave force
physical test
berthing stability condition
anti-slipping, antidumping stability