护理干预对子宫肌瘤患者围术期负性情绪及护理满意度的影响分析

Analysis of influence by nursing intervention on perioperative negative emotion and nursing satisfaction in uterine fibroid patients

目的探讨护理干预对子宫肌瘤患者围术期负性情绪及护理满意度的影响。方法 76例围术期子宫肌瘤患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组38例。对照组患者给予常规护理,观察组患者给予系统护理干预,比较两组患者护理前后的焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、护理满意度。结果护理后,两组患者的SAS评分及SDS评分较治疗前均有所下降,观察组护理后SAS评分为(32.4±1.9)分,SDS评分为(41.5±2.2)分;对照组护理后SAS评分为(40.2±2.3)分,SDS评分为(49.6±4.2)分,观察组患者护理后SAS、SDS评分下降幅度明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者护理满意度为92.11%,对照组患者为73.68%,观察组护理满意度显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对子宫肌瘤围术期患者,护理干预能显著改善患者抑郁和焦虑情绪,降低机体应激反应,改善护患关系,提高护理满意度,值得临床推广和应用。

Objective To investigate influence by nursing intervention on perioperative negative emotion and nursing satisfaction in uterine fibroid patients. Methods A total of 76 uterine fibroid patients in perioperative period were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 38 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the observation group received systematic nursing intervention. Comparison was made on self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, self-rating depression scale (SDS)score and nursing satisfaction between the two group before and after nursing. Results After nursing, both groups had lower SAS score and SDS score than those before treatment. The observation group had SAS score after nursing as (32.4±1.9) points and SDS score as (41.5±2.2) points. The control group had SAS score after nursin gas (40.2±2.3) points and SDS score as (49.6±4.2) points. The observation group had obviously better decreasingrange of SAS and SDS scores after nursing than the control group, and their difference had statistical significance(P<0.05). The observation group had nursing satisfaction as 92.11%, which was 73.68% in the control group. Theobservation group had much higher nursing satisfaction than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Nursing intervention can remarkably improve depression and anxiety emotionin uterine fibroid patients in perioperative period. This method can reduce systemic stress responses, improve nurse-patient relationship and enhance nursing satisfaction. It is worth clinical promotion and application.