期刊文献+

FURS和PCNL治疗肾结石的临床价值分析

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析输尿管软镜碎石取石术(FURS)与经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)治疗肾结石的临床价值。方法 88例肾结石患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组44例。对照组患者行PCNL治疗,观察组患者行FURS治疗,对比两组患者相关指标变化情况。结果两组结石清除率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者手术时间为(75.6±10.5)min、术中出血量为(10.2±5.0)ml,住院时间为(3.2±1.0)d,均低于对照组的(110.5±20.5)min、(85.6±25.0)ml、(6.5±1.5)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组肾绞痛、肾包膜下血肿和菌血症发生率分别为4.5%、2.3%和2.3%,均远低于对照组的22.7%、15.9%、15.9%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 FURS和PCNL治疗肾结石均具有较好的效果,但FURS的手术时间短,术中出血量少,并发症少,可缩短患者的住院时间,应在临床推广。
作者 杨代俊
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2017年第5期44-45,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献87

  • 1周四维.输尿管上段结石的微创外科治疗[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):365-367. 被引量:108
  • 2曹正国,诸禹平,苏红,孙友文,樊龙昌,吴斌,周林玉,亓林.现代微创手术治疗输尿管上段结石[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(10):1052-1055. 被引量:30
  • 3Seklehner S, Laudano MA, Chughtai B, et al. Trends in the uti- lization of percutaneous and open nephrolithotomy in the treat- ment of renal calculi [J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27: 984-988.
  • 4Anand A, Kumar R, Dogra PN. Safety and efficacy of a superior caliceal puncture in pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy [ J ]. J Endourol, 2010, 24: 1725-1728.
  • 5de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, et al. The clinical re- search office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, compllcations, and outcomes in 11,885 pa- tients [J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28: 131-139.
  • 6Fall B, Mouraeade P, Bergerat S, et al. Flexible ureteroseopy and laser tithotripsy for kidney and ureter stone: Indications, morbidity and outcome [J]. Prog Urol, 2014, 24: 771-776.
  • 7Sanguedolce F, Liatsikos E, Verze P, et al. Use of flexible uret- eroseopy in the clinical practice for the treatment of renal stones: results from a large European survey conducted by the EAU Young Academic Urologists-Working Party on Endourology and Urolithiasis [J]. Urolithiasis, 2014, 42: 329-334.
  • 8Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M. Uretcropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi [ J ].BJU Int, 2013, 111 (3 Pt B) : E127-131.
  • 9Singh BP, Prakash J, Sankhwar SN,et al . Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes [J]. Urology, 2014, 83: 1016-1022.
  • 10Li S, Liu TZ, Wang XH, et al. Randomized controlled trial com- paring retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeiolithotomy versus percuta- neous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic cal- culi: a pilot study [J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28: 946-950.

共引文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部