丁螺环酮与醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症的疗效对比

Effects Comparison on Buspirone and Activating Brain and Regaining Consciousness Acupuncture in Treating Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

目的:对比丁螺环酮与醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症的临床疗效。方法:将120例患者随机分为观察组、对照组各60例。观察组采用醒脑开窍针刺法进行治疗,对照组口服丁螺环酮,观察2组治疗前后汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和耶鲁布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS)评分,以及临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果:HAMA及Y-BOCS评分2治疗后均明显降低(P<0.05),治疗后2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。总有效率观察组为85.00%,对照组为81.67%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组未见不良反应发生,对照组不良反应发生率15.00%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症临床疗效显著,且未见不良反应。

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of buspirone and activating brain and regaining consciousness acupuncture in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder.Methods:120patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the comtrol group,each group were60cases.The observation group was given activating brain and regaining consciousness acupuncture,the control group were given buspirone.HAMA,Y-BOCS scores,clinical effects and adverse reaction occurrence conditions were observed before and after treatment in both groups.Results:HAMA,and Y-BOCS scores decreased obviously after treatment in both groups(P<0.05),there were no statistical differences between two groups after treatment(P>0.05).The total effective rate in the observation group was85.00%,the control group was81.67%,there was no statistical difference(P>0.05).No adverse reaction in the observation group,the adverse reaction rate in the control group was15.00%,there was staitsitcal difference(P<0.05).Conclusion:Activating brain and regaining consciousness acupuncture in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder has significant clinical effects,and no adverse reactions