朝鲜儒学对朱子思想的诠释

Interpretations of Zhu Xi's Ideas in Korean Confucianism

韩半岛朝鲜朝儒学以朱子思想为正宗,大致可分为主理与主气两派,这两派对朱子的学理有不同的诠释。而这两种观点,与宋明以后的朱子学诠释都有不同,对于当代新儒家对朱子思想的衡定,也有补充作用。拟概述朝鲜儒学这两派的朱子诠释,又融入康德道德哲学的若干看法,希望能回应牟宗三认为朱子是他律的伦理学与别子为宗的论点。

Taking Zhu Xi as its mainstream representative,Korean Confucianism is generally divided into two schools:the School of Li(principle) and the School of Qi(vital force).While different from each other,they are also different from Chinese Confucianism after the Song-Ming period in their interpretation of Zhu Xi,and they have also come to supplement the present-day New Confucian analysis of Zhu Xi.In this paper,their different interpretations are incorporated with relevant ideas of Kant's moral philosophy,in response to Mou Zongsan's claim that Zhu Xi has developed a heteronomic ethics and,being a 'stepson,' usurped the place of orthodoxy in the Confucian lineage.