罗光、牟宗三对儒学形上学的不同诠释

Lo Kuang and Mou Zongsan's Variant Understandings of Confucianism

20世纪中国哲学家的儒学诠释,基本上是在中西哲学对比的视野下,以其特定的哲学立场为基础,对传统儒学的现代重建。就形上学的视角而言,上述儒学诠释包括形上学与去形上学两种不同的进路,而前者同样包含多种不同形态,罗光、牟宗三对儒学的形上学诠释则是其中较具代表性的两种形态。他们的诠释分别以士林哲学的理论架构和宋明儒学"天道性命相贯通"的睿识为视角,因而两家对儒学形上学的理论定位有很大的差别。本文尝试透过具体的文本分析,以阐明罗、牟儒学诠释的异同点,并作扼要的评论。

Twentieth-century Chinese philosophy for the most part interpreted Confucianism from a Chinese-Western comparative perspective and pursued a modern reconstruction of traditional Confucianism.Its interpretive trends included both metaphysical and antimetaphysical approaches,and within the former,two representative figures were Stanislaus Lo Kuang and Mou Zongsan.They adopted the standpoints of Scholastic philosophy and Song-Ming Confucianism respectively and hence came to define Confucian metaphysics very differently.This essay attempts to appraise Lo's and Mou's interpretive differences through the analysis and explication of particular texts.