期刊文献+

合取谬误问题的性质研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 大量的概率判断的研究表明,人们经常违反理性的概率推断,即贝叶斯定律。合取谬误现象就是其中之一,它是指在不确定条件下,个体作出合取事件的概率大于构成它的各个子事件的概率的判断。本文试图从语义认知、表征方式、潜在惊奇值、概念情境化的角度对合取谬误问题的性质进行分析。
作者 王晓露
机构地区 安徽师范大学
出处 《科教导刊(电子版)》 2017年第8期174-175,共2页 The Guide of Science & Education (Electronic Edition)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献48

  • 1刘立秋,陆勇.Linda问题:“齐当别”抉择模型的解释[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):735-742. 被引量:7
  • 2Agnoli, F., & Krantz, D. H. (1989). Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: the case of the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Psychology, 21(4),515-550.
  • 3Aristidou, M. (2013). Irrationality re-Examined: A few comments on the conjunction fallacy. Open Journal of Philosophy. 3(2), 329-336.
  • 4Bonini, N., Tentori, K., & Osherson, D. (2004). A different conjunction fallacy. Mind & Language. 19(2), 199-210.
  • 5Bovens, L., & Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian epistemology.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • 6Cassotti, M., & Moutier, S. (2010). How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: Evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition. 72(3), 378-384.
  • 7Charness, G., Karni, E., & Levin, D. (2010). On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: New experimental evidence regarding Linda. Games and Economic Behavior. 68(2), 551-556.
  • 8Connolly, A. C., Fodor, J. A., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (2007). Why stereotypes don't even make good defaults. Cognition. 103(1), 1-22.
  • 9Crupi, V., Fitelson, B., & Tentori, K. (2008). Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking & Reasoning. 14(2),182-199.
  • 10Davies, J. B., Anderson, A., & Little, D. (2011). Social cognition and the so-called conjunction fallacy. Current Psychology. 30(3),245-257.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部