期刊文献+

欧洲满意度调查量表信效度分析及其在上海某社区的应用情况 被引量:2

Reliability and validity analysis of european satisfaction survey scale(EUROPEP) and its application in a community in Shanghai
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨欧洲满意度调查量表的信效度及应用。方法:选择居民进行欧洲满意度调查量表的问卷调查。结果:欧洲满意度调查量表在该社区居民满意度调查中的信度及复测信度检测符合要求。社区居民总体医疗满意度较高。结论:欧洲满意度调查量表可以应用于社区居民医疗满意度分析。 Objective:To explore the reliability and validity of european satisfaction survey scale and its application.Methods:Residents were given questionnaire of european satisfaction survey scale.Results:The reliability and test-retest reliability ofeuropean satisfaction survey scale in the application of community residents satisfaction survey were found to meet therequirements.The total medical satisfaction of community residents was higher.Conclusion:European satisfaction survey scale canbe applied to the satisfaction analysis of community medical treatment.
作者 谭诚炜 祝海燕 Tan Chengwei;Zhu Haiyan(Gaojing Town Community Health Service Center of Baoshan District,Shanghai City 200435)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2017年第13期147-148,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 欧洲满意度调查量表 满意度 信效度 European satisfaction survey scale Satisfaction Reliability and validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1刘玉秀,徐少青.TOPSIS法用于医院工作质量的多指标综合评价[J].中国卫生统计,1993,10(2):12-15. 被引量:88
  • 2培育竞争市场 破解“看病难、看病贵”难题——宿迁市医疗卫生体制改革后医疗服务价格情况调查[J].价格理论与实践,2006(10):12-13. 被引量:2
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.

共引文献1015

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部