期刊文献+

中国资本海外并购职业足球俱乐部协议中解纷条款的考量 被引量:6

A study of dispute resolution clauses in the agreements of oversea mergers and acquisitions of professional football clubs by Chinese capital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国资本全球扩张,已经涉及体育产业,风起云涌的中国资本海外职业足球俱乐部并购就是其突出的表现。海外并购风险重重,最佳方案乃是设定解纷条款,特别是仲裁条款,实现对风险的尾端全面防控。仲裁条款的设定是对仲裁机构、仲裁地、仲裁法律的适用,及仲裁裁决效力等核心要素的搭配。为中国并购方的利益最大化,仲裁条款的拟订可分上、中、下三策。上策以我为主,中策等距中立,下策逆用法理。解纷条款极易引发次生争议,中国资本在海外职业足球俱乐部并购过程中必须倚重和妙用解纷条款,这也是促使体育领域趋于善治的辩证法。 Chinese capital is expanding globally,having involved the sports industry;dazzling oversea mergers and acquisitions of professional football clubs by Chinese capital is its outstanding performance.Oversea mergers and acquisitions have various risks;the best solution is to set dispute resolution clauses,especially arbitration clauses,so,as to realize comprehensive prevention and control of the ends of risks.The setting of arbitration clauses is the application of arbitration institutions,seats of arbitration and arbitration laws,as well as the combinations of core elements such as validity of arbitral awards.In order to maximize the interests of Chinese acquirers,arbitration clauses drafted can be sorted into good,neutral and bad clauses.The good clauses are clauses in favor of Chinese acquirers;the neutral clauses are neutral;the bad clauses are clauses in favor of the opposite parties.Dispute resolution clauses tend to trigger secondary disputes easily;in the process of oversea mergers and acquisitions of professional football clubs,Chinese acquirers must rely heavily on and cleverly use dispute resolution clauses,which is also the dialectics for the sports area to gradually become an area of good governance.
作者 黄晖 张春良 HUANG Hui;ZHANG Chun-liang(Law School,Chonqing University,Chongqing 400044,,China;School of International Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处 《体育学刊》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期91-95,共5页 Journal of Physical Education
基金 2016年度重庆大学中央高校学院科技创新专项"中国体育法治信念建构研究"(106112016CDJSK080010)
关键词 体育法 海外并购 足球俱乐部 解纷条款 国际体育仲裁院 体育善治 sports law oversea merger and acquisition football club dispute resolution clause Court of Arbitration for Sport good governance of sport
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1张春良,高峰,谢红光.北京奥运会法制危机及其消解[J].重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版),2006,5(3):33-36. 被引量:2
  • 2张春良.国际商事仲裁权的性态[J].西南政法大学学报,2006,8(2):20-26. 被引量:13
  • 3Stephen A. Kaufman. Issues in InternationalSports Arbitration[J]. Boston University International Law Journal, 1995, (13) : 527--549.
  • 4Philippe Fouehard, Enunanuel Gaillard and Berthold Goldman. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration[M]. Beijing: C1TIC Publishing House, 2004: 194-196.
  • 5Mauro Rubino-Sammartano, International Arbitration Law and Practice[M].北京: Citic Publishing House, 2004 : 225.
  • 6Jan Paulsson, Arbitration of International Sports Dis- putes, Arbitration International, 1993, (9): 361.
  • 7Steve Woodward, Arbitration Council Set to Handle Grievances[N], USA Today, June 24, 1994, at C3.
  • 8Besiktas vs. Federation Internationale de Football Associa- tion & SCFreiburg, in Digest of CAS Awards III (2001-2003)[Z]. Edited by Matthieu Reeb, Estelle du La Roch- efouehauld. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004:90 -96.
  • 9Bassani Antivari vs. IOC, CAS ad hoc Division(OWG Salt Lake City 2002)003, in Digest of CAS Awards Ⅲ(2001--2003) [Z]. Edited by Matthieu Reeb, Estelle du La Rochefotuchauld. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004: 585-591.
  • 10ICC Award 1434/1975.

共引文献42

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部