期刊文献+

不同农艺措施对巢湖沿岸坡耕地不同形态磷径流输出的控制效果 被引量:4

Effect of agronomic measures on phosphorous loss via runoff in sloping croplands around Chaohu Lake
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为明确巢湖沿岸坡耕地不同农艺措施对生态保护和水环境治理的影响,以农业面源污染长期定位观测基地为平台,于2014—2015年连续2 a对常规耕作(CK)、植物篱(黄花菜,PH)、植物篱+秸秆覆盖(PHS)和等高垄作(CR)4种农艺措施下的水土及随地表径流迁移的各种形态磷进行了监测。结果表明,与常规耕作相比,PH、PHS和CR能有效地减少径流量和产沙量(P<0.05),降低效果依次为:PHS>PH>CR。与CK相比,PH、PHS和CR可分别减少23.5%、36.5%和19.7%的径流流失和29.5%、45.2%和26.3%的土壤流失,表现出显著的水土保持作用。CK条件下的径流液总磷(TP)浓度是0.612~1.220 mg·L^(-1),其中颗粒态磷(PP)占总磷的71.5%~81.7%,颗粒态磷是磷随地表径流迁移的主要形态。在溶解态总磷(DTP)中,溶解态正磷酸盐(D-Ortho-P)所占比例较大,为87.4%~90.7%;溶解态有机磷(DOP)所占比例较小,仅占9.3%~12.6%。与CK相比,PHS、PH和CR显著降低了径流液PP和TP的浓度(P<0.05),但却不同程度地提高了DTP和D-Ortho-P的浓度,而对DOP的浓度无显著影响(P>0.05)。CK条件下,磷的年流失负荷平均为0.706 kg·hm^(-2),占当年作物施磷量0.98%。与CK处理相比,PH、PHS和CR处理磷的年流失负荷分别降低38.4%、53.8%和33.4%(P<0.05),其对磷素输出的控制效应主要通过减少径流量和降低径流液PP的浓度来实现的。综上可知,植物篱(黄花菜)、植物篱+秸秆还田和等高垄作是控制巢湖沿岸坡耕地水土及磷径流输出的有效措施,其中植物篱配合秸秆覆盖还田效果最佳。该研究可为巢湖流域坡耕地水土流失和面源污染防治提供科学依据。 Eutrophication has been recognized as one of the main global environmental problems in areas with intensive agricultural production where there is nutrient export from farmlands to surface water bodies.Phosphorous(P)via runoff from farmland has been found to be one of the main contributors to water-quality degradation in Chaohu Lake.Thus,source control of P loss from farmlands was critical in remediation of eutrophication in Chaohu Lake.In order to test the efficiency and efficacy of different agronomic measures on reducing runoff,sediment and P loss,a long-term field runoff experiment was carried out in a sloping cropland around Chaohu Lake.Four treatments of agronomic measure were applied-1)conventional tillage(CK),2)plant hedgerow of Hemerocallis citrina(PH),3)plant hedgerow with straw mulching(PHS)and4)contour ridge(CR).Runoff volume,soil loss,concentrations of TP(total phosphorus),PP(particulate phosphorus),DTP(dissolved total phosphorus),D-Ortho-P(dissolved orthophosphate phosphorus)and DOP(dissolved organic phosphorus)as well as P loss via runoff were determined.The results for2014-2015showed that PH,PHS and CR treatments significantly reduced soil and water loss in the order as follows:PHS>PH>CR(P<0.05).Also the reduction in sediment was great than that in runoff.Compared with CK,agronomic measures of PH,PHS and CR decreased runoff,respectively,by23.5%,36.5%and19.7%,and reduced sediment,respectively,by29.5%,45.2%and26.3%,showing significant effect on soil and water conservation(P<0.05).The concentration of TP in runoff under CK was0.612-1.220mg·L?1,in which PP was the predominant form,accounting for71.5%-81.7%of the TP.In DTP,D-Ortho-P was the main form,accounting for87.4%-90.7%,while DOP remained in low concentration.It was found that the three agronomic measures(PH,PHS and CR)significantly reduced PP and TP concentrations in runoff(P<0.05),concurrently increased the concentrations of DTP and D-Ortho-P,but had no obvious effect on DOP concentration(P>0.05).Obviously,TP concentrations in the current study were higher than0.4mg?L?1,exceeding Class V level of the national environmental quality standards for surface water(GB3838-2002).The results implied that P loss via runoff from farmlands in Chaohu Lake region posed pollution risk if allowed to drain directly into the lake.Besides,annual P runoff loss from sloping croplands under CK was0.706kg·hm?2,the equivalent of0.98%of applied P fertilizer in the experiment.Compared with CK,PH,PHS and CR reduced annual P loss respectively by38.4%,53.8%and33.4%.Another finding in the study was that the reduction in runoff volume and that in PP concentration were mainly responsible for the decline in Ploss.In conclusion therefore,PH,PHS and CR significantly reduced soil,water and P loss via runoff in sloping farmlands in Chaohu Lake region.Among the treatments,PHS was the most effective.The results of this study provided more insight into the need for strategies to reduce agricultural non-point source pollution in Chaohu Lake region and other similar regions.
作者 王静 王允青 叶寅 孟超峰 王道中 郭熙盛 吕国安 WANG Jing;WANG Yunqing;YE Yin;MENG Chaofeng;WANG Daozhong;GUO Xisheng;LYU Guo’an(Institute of Soil & Fertilizer, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;Provincial Key Lab for Nutrient Cycling, Resources & Environment of Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, China;Soil and Fertilizer Station of Xuancheng, Xuancheng 242000, China)
出处 《中国生态农业学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期911-919,共9页 Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41401308) 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2015ZX07204-007) 安徽省重点实验室绩效评价补助项目(1606c08231)资助~~
关键词 径流 坡耕地 植物篱 秸秆覆盖 等高垄作 巢湖 Phosphorous Runoff Sloping cropland Hedgerow of Hemerocallis citrina Straw mulching Contour ridge Chaohu Lake
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献280

共引文献1696

同被引文献91

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部