论转租——以次承租人租赁权的物权化为中心

On Sublease:A Case Study of the Right in Rem Tendency of the Leasehold of the Subtenant

我国合同法确立了租赁权的物权化,实际上是赋予了租赁权人法律地位的稳定化,但仅凭法律条文规定并不能明确其是否可适用于次承租人的租赁权。由于承租人的转租行为与转租租赁合同可以区分,所以转租租赁合同的效力既不受出租人同意权的影响,也不受合同履行行为的影响。原租赁合同的内容和效力也不能影响转租租赁合同的效力。转租租赁合同这种效力上的独立性为其物权化提供了基础。但在确定次承租人法律地位物权化的效力时,其相关内容又要受出租人同意权和原租赁合同的影响。

The provisions on right in rem tendency of leasehold in Chinese Contract Law gives leaseholders more stable legal status,but whether the provisions can be applied to the leasehold of subtenant is not clear yet.Because the act of sublease and the contract of sublease can be distinguished from each other,the validity of sublet contract will not be affected by either the lessor's right of consent or the act of performance,even the original lease contract cannot affect the validity of the sublease contract.It is the independence of the validity of the sublease contract that makes the right in rem tendency possible.While in confirming the validity of right in rem tendency of subtenant's legal status,the related content about validity will still be affected by the lessor's right of consent and the original lease contract.