摘要
我国的《企业破产法》中并没有就破产管理人的民事地位给出明晰的指引,继而民事诉讼法及相关法中也没有就其诉讼地位表明态度,这导致社会公众、涉诉企业,甚至部分司法人员就以上问题产生认识和理解上的分歧。清算期间,债务人的法律人格的降格,会阻遏其在诉讼中充当诉讼主体。为了破产关系中多方主体利益的均衡实现,破产管理人并不能代表任意一方的利益。概括性的管理权及管理过程塑造了破产管理人在清算期间自身的诉的利益,此成为破产管理人是诉讼担当人的学理解释。破产管理人拥有诉讼实施权是诉讼担当制度的诉讼法基础。诉的利益与诉讼实施权的双重表述提示了破产管理人应然的诉讼主体地位——诉讼担当人。
Enterprise Bankruptcy Law does not give a clear guidance on the civil status of the bankruptcyadministrator in China.Consequently,the Civil Procedure law and other related laws have not expressed theirattitude towards his legal status in litigation,which leads to differences of opinion and understanding in termsof the above issues from social publics,enterprise involved in lawsuit,and even some judicial officers.Duringthe period of liquidation,the derogation of the legal personality of the debtor will prevent him from acting asthe litigation subject.In order to achieve the equilibrium effect of the multi-party interests in the bankruptcyrelationship,the bankruptcy administrator can not represent the interests of any party.The general right ofmanagement and the litigation interest of bankruptcy administrator in liquidation shaped in the process ofmanagement makes the academic explanation of the idea that the bankruptcy manager plays the role of litigationundertaker.That the bankruptcy manager holds the implementation right of lawsuits forms the procedurallaw basis of the litigation undertaking system.The dual expression about the interest of litigation and theimplementation right of lawsuits indicates the due status of litigation subject-litigation undertaker.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2017年第2期7-16,共10页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
破产管理人
清算
正当当事人
诉讼担当
bankruptcy administrator
liquidation
legitimate party
litigation undertaking