科学数据引用规范的内容特点分析被引量：8

Analysis of Content of Scientific Data Citation Standards

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文选取科学数据组织机构所拟定的、面向科学数据引用的规范性文本为研究对象,从科学数据引用对象、科学数据引用元素、科学数据引用格式、科学数据引用的标识符等方面,分析科学数据引用规范的内容特点。研究发现,现有科学数据引用规范内容多遵循科学数据引用原则,且受传统规范影响较大,但在引用对象、引用元素与引用格式等方面存在差异。 Taking data citation standards proposed by scientific data organizations as the object,the study analyzed the content characteristics of scientific data citation standards,from the aspects of citation units,citation elements,citation styles,and identifier application.It is found that most current data citation standards endorse the joint declaration of data citation principles,and are influenced by common citation styles,but different in citation units,citation elements and citation styles.

作者邸弘阳耿骞黄国彬屈亚杰 DI HongYang;GENG Qian;HUANG GuoBin;QU YaJie(School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

机构地区北京师范大学政府管理学院

出处《数字图书馆论坛》 CSSCI 2017年第6期9-15,共7页 Digital Library Forum

基金国家社会科学基金项目"云计算环境下图书馆信息资源安全政策法律研究"(编号:11CTQ004)资助

关键词科学数据引用规范 Scientific Data Citation Standards

分类号 G353.1 [文化科学—情报学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1张静蓓,吕俊生,田野.国外科学数据引用研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(8):91-95. 被引量：17
2张静蓓,田野,吕俊生.科学数据引用规范研究进展[J].图书与情报,2014(5):100-104. 被引量：16
3黄如花,李楠.国外科学数据引用规范调查分析与启示[J].图书馆学研究,2016(10):2-9. 被引量：26

二级参考文献65

1中文DOI[EB/OL].[2008-09-26].http://www.chinadoi.cn.
2科学数据通讯第五期[EB/OL].[2012-07-10].http://www.codata.cn/upload/ebook/201112561972869.pdf.
3Data Cite[EB/OL].[2014-02-15]. https://www.datacite.org/.
4Institute for Quantitative Social Science 2013.Data citation principles workshop[EB/OL].[2014-02-14].http://thedata.org/presentations/data-citation-principles-and-practices.
5Australian National Data Service 2011.“Building a culture of research data citation”workshop[EB/OL].[2014-02-15].http://www.iassistdata.org/blog/workshop-building-culture-research-data-citation.
6Thomson Reuters.汤森路透发布 Data Citation Index 促进对全球研究数据的发现[EB/OL]. [2014-02-15].http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com.cn/press/press20121102/.
7Parsons M A, Duerr R, Minster J B. Data citation and peer review[J]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2010, 91(34): 297-298.
8Hayes P J, Halpin H. In defense of ambiguity[J]. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2008, 4(2): 1-18.
9Duerr R E, Downs R R, Tilmes C, et al. On the utility of identification schemes for digital earth science data:An assessment and recommendations[J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2011, 4(3): 139-160.
10Weber N M, Piwowar H A, Vision T J. Evaluating data citation and sharing policies in the environmental sciences[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 47(1): 1-2.