期刊文献+

微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术与传统后路开放手术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效 被引量:1

Curative effect of minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion and internal fixation and conventional posterior open surgery in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微创颈椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术与传统后路开放手术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效。方法:收治腰椎退变性疾病患者76例,随机分为对照组和研究组,对照组采用传统后路开放手术治疗,研究组采用微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果:研究组住院时间、引流量、出血量、手术时间和CPK评分均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:微创颈椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效显著。 Objective:To explore the curative effect of minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion and internal fixation and conventional posterior open surgery in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.Methods:76patients with lumbar degenerative disease were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group and the study group.The control group was treated with conventional posterior open surgery.The study group was treated by minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion and internal fixation.We compared the therapeutic effect of two groups.Results:In the study group,the length of hospital stay,drainage volume,bleeding volume,operation time and CPK score were better than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The curative effect of minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease was significant.
作者 宋建康 Song Jiankang(Chengdu Shuangnan Hospital of Sichuan 610000)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2017年第19期55-56,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 腰椎退变性疾病 微创颈椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术 传统后路开放手术 Lumbar degenerative disease Minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion and internal fixation Conventional posterior open surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1Kanayama M,Togawa D,Hashimoto T,et al.Motion-preserving surgery can prevent early break down of adjacent segments:comparison of posterior dynamic stabilization with spinal fusion[J].Spinal Disord Tech,2009,22(7):463-467.
  • 2Park P,Garton HJ,Gala VC,et al.Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion:revie of the literature.Spine,2004,29(17):1938-1944.
  • 3Brantigan JW,Steffee AD,Lewis ML,et al.Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system:two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial[J].Spine,2000,25(11):1437-1446.
  • 4Kurtz SM,Devine JN.PEEK biomaterials in trauma,orthopedic,and spinal implants[J].Biomaterials,2007,28(32):4845-4869.
  • 5Ponnappan RK,Serhan H,Zarda B,et al.Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation[J].Spine,2009,9(3):263-267.
  • 6Mavrogenis AF,Vottis C,Triantafyllopoulos G,et al.PEEK rod systems for the spine[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol.2014,24(Suppl 1):S111-116.
  • 7Aota Y,Kumano K,Hirabayashi S.Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders[J].J Spinal Disord,1995,8(6):464-473.
  • 8Etebar S,Cahill DW.Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability[J].Neurosurg,1999,90(2 Suppl):163-169.
  • 9Athanasakopoulos M,Mavrogenis AF,Triantafyllopoulos G,et al.Posterior spinal fusion using pedicle screws[J].Orthopedics,2013,36(7):e951-e957.
  • 10Galbusera F,Bellini CM,Anasetti F,et al.Rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices:a biomechanical comparison[J].Med Eng Phy,2010,33(4):490-496.

共引文献41

同被引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部