期刊文献+

改良Kinder手术治疗疼痛性足副舟骨损伤的临床疗效 被引量:6

The clinical effect of modified Kinder surgical treatment of painful foot accessory navicular injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析评价改良Kinder手术治疗疼痛性足副舟骨的临床效果。方法回顾2006年1月至2013年12月因足副舟骨损伤接受手术治疗的患者62例(71足),其中男性患者18例,女性患者44例。所有患者采用改良Kidner术进行治疗,在术前和术后随访中进行主观评估,并分析手术前后AOFAS中足功能评分。结果 62例(71足)患者中Ⅰ型副舟骨损伤7例,Ⅱ型副舟骨损伤58例,Ⅲ型副舟骨损伤6例。术后随访59例(68足),平均随访35.3个月,总体优良率91.6%。术后AOFAS评分显著高于术前。结论疼痛性副舟骨多为Ⅱ型。改良Kinder手术治疗副舟骨损伤可以取得满意的临床效果。 Objective Analysis of evaluation of modified kinder surgical therapy for pain is enough of the accessory navicularbone clinical effect.Methods Review in2006January to December2013due to the foot of the accessory navicular bone injuryreceived surgical treatment of patients62cases(71feet),including18cases of male patients,female patients with44cases.All patientswith modified Kidner operation treatment,and in preoperative and postoperative follow-up were used for subjective evaluation,andanalysis before and after the operation of AOFAS score.Results62cases(71feet)in7patients with type I accessory navicular boneinjury,58cases of typeⅡaccessory navicular bone injury,6cases of typeⅢaccessory navicular bone injury.59cases were followed up(68feet),with an average follow-up of35.3months,the overall excellent and good rate was91.6%.The postoperative AOFAS score wassignificantly higher than that before operation.Conclusion Most of the patients with painful accessory navicular were typeⅡ.Theclinical effect of modified Kinder operation for treatment of painful accessory navicular injury can achieve satisfactory.
作者 谢兴 郭秦炜 焦晨 梅宇 胡跃林 XIE Xing;GUO Qin-wei;JIAO Chen;MEI Yu;HU Yue-lin(Institute of Sports Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China)
出处 《足踝外科电子杂志》 2016年第3期29-31,共3页 Electronic Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
关键词 副舟骨损伤 改良Kidner术 Injury of accessory navicular Modified Kidner surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1王桂生 朱通伯 吴祖饶.骨科手术学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1991.394-395.
  • 2彭昊 袁仙桃 明江华 等.改良Kidner手术治疗先天性副舟骨.湖北医科大学学报,1996,5:41-42.
  • 3Choi YS, Lee KT, Kang HS, et al. MR imaging findings of painful type Ⅱ accessory navieular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2004, 5(4) :274-279.
  • 4Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M, et aL Incidence of accessory ossides and se.samoid bones in the feet= a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat, 2009; 31(1):19-24.
  • 5Perdikakis E, Grigoraki E, Karantanas A. Os naviculare: the multi ossicle configuration of a nom~al variant. Skeletal Radiol, 2011; 40(1):85-88.
  • 6IV~ller "IT. Painful accesmry bones of the foot. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2002; 6(2) :15-161.
  • 7McKusick VA. Catalogs of autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X- linked phenotypes[A]. In: McKusick VA ed. Mendelian Inheritance in Man [M]. 2th ed, lMtimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1978:147.
  • 8Kiter E, Erduran M, Gtmal I. Inheritance of the ames,soU navicular bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010; 120(11):582-583.
  • 9Dobbs MB, Walton T. Autommal dominant transmission of accessory navicular. Iowa Orthop .1, 2004; 24(24):84-85.
  • 10Coughlin MJ. Sernoids and aecesmry bones of the foot[A]. In: Coughlin MJ. Maran RA, hltzmea CL eds. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle[M]. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2007:531- 610.

共引文献33

同被引文献26

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部