期刊文献+

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对NSTE-ACS患者PCI术后血小板反应性及炎性因子的影响 被引量:4

Effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and inflammatory factors in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome,NSTE-ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)后血小板反应性和炎性因子影响。方法将122例NSTE-ACS患者随机分为替格瑞洛组(n=60)和氯吡格雷组(n=62),在行PCI术前,替格瑞洛组和氯吡格雷组分别给予负荷剂量的替格瑞洛(180 mg)及氯吡格雷(300 mg),术后继续口服维持剂量的药物。比较两组患者治疗前及术后2 h、24 h、7 d的血小板反应指数(platelet reactivity index,PRI)和1 d、7 d、30 d炎性因子水平及随访30 d后的缺血率和出血率。结果替格瑞洛组术后2 h、24 h、7 d的PRI均低于氯吡格雷组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);术后1 d、7 d、30 d替格瑞洛组的炎性因子水平均低于氯吡格雷组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组患者缺血和出血事件无明显差异。结论替格瑞洛较氯吡格雷更能够有效降低NSTE-ACS患者术后PRI和炎性因子水平,并且可能有降低不良心血管事件的趋势。 Objective The study objective was to compare the effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and inflammatory factors in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome(NSTE-ACS)after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods A total of122NSTE-ACS patients were randomly divided into the ticagrelor group(n=60)and the clopidogrel group(n=62).The ticagrelor group was given a loading dose of ticagrelor(180mg)and the clopidogrel group with300mg clopidorel.The platelet reactivity index(PRI)was measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation(VASP-P)before PCI and at2h,24h and7d after PCI.Inflammatory factors were compared by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)before PCI and1d,7d and30d after PCI.Ischemic and bleeding events were followed up for30d.Results The PRI of the ticagrelor group was significantly lower than the clopidogrel group2h,24h,7d after PCI,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).The levels of inflammatory factors were lower in the ticagrelor group than those in clopidogrel group1d,7d and30d after PCI(P<0.01).During the30d follow-up period,no significant difference with regard to the rates of bleeding and ischemic events was found between the two groups.Conclusions Ticagrelor produces a significantly higher platelet inhibition and anti-inflammatory effects compared with clopidogrel in NSTE-ACS,and it can reduce the incidence of ischemic events without an increase in the rate of overall major bleeding.
作者 丁鹏 魏玉杰 刘惠亮 DING Peng;WEI Yujie;LIU Huiliang(Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Beijing 100039,China)
出处 《中华灾害救援医学》 2017年第7期372-376,共5页 Chinese Journal of Disaster Medicine
关键词 替格瑞洛 氯吡格雷 非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征 炎性因子 ticagrelor clopidogrel non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome inflammatory factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Mathers CD, Boerma T, Ma Fat D. Global and regional causes of death. Br Med Bull 2009; 92; 7-32.
  • 2Cannon CP, Battler A, Brindis RG, et al. American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2114-2130.
  • 3van Domburg RT, van Miltenburg-van Zijl AJ, Veerhoek RJ, et al. Unstable angina: good long-term outcome after a complicated early course. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 1534-1539.
  • 4Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med2003; 163: 2345-2353.
  • 5Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry. JAMA 2004; 291: 2727-2733.
  • 6Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999-3054.
  • 7Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice Guidelines. Circulation 2012; 126: 875-910.
  • 8Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 28-66.
  • 9Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 2004; 110: 588-636.
  • 10Feng J, Li Z, Zhang F, et al. Assessment of coronary artery flow velocity pattern as a long-term predictor of left ventricular function and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention in anterior acute myocardial infarction. Intern Med 2010; 49: 1693-1701.

共引文献14

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部