期刊文献+

论《失乐园》对战争的戏仿 被引量:2

On parody of war in Paradise Lost
下载PDF
导出
摘要 描写战争是自荷马以降史诗史上的一个重要传统。弥尔顿在《失乐园》里延续这一传统,将天庭之战置于史诗中心,以细数撒旦军及其战争武器之名录为史诗开篇,尤其设计了三个分别发生在地狱、伊甸园和天堂里的代表性战斗场面。然而,弥尔顿将无以匹敌之体格神力、战争武器以及好战精神赋予恶魔撒旦及其之流,其战斗场面亦并非史诗传统的战争场面,而是对战争的戏仿。这并不是因为弥尔顿不擅长书写传统的经典战争,而是因为弥尔顿在《失乐园》里将史诗主题从"战争"改写为"人的堕落和再生"。此乃弥尔顿对史诗传统的初步创新。 Describing war has been an important epic tradition since Homer,which Milton abides by in Paradise Lost by setting“the War of Heaven”in the middle of the epic,by beginning the epic with the catalogue of Satan and his warriors as well as their weapons,and especially by designing three representative battles occurring respectively in Hell,Eden and the Paradise.However,Milton endows unparalleled physical power,military force and warlike spirit to Evil Satan and his army,and designates the battles as parody of war.This does not mean that Milton is not good at describing traditional battles,but discloses that he rewrites the epic theme from the traditional one of war to that of Man's Fall and Regeneration,which constitutes his initial attempt to innovate the epic tradition.
作者 吴玲英 易鸣 WU Lingying;YI Ming(School of Foreign Languages, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2017年第4期165-171,共7页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"弥尔顿与西方史诗传统研究"(14BWW057)
关键词 《失乐园》 战争 戏仿 Paradise Lost war parody
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1Frye, Northrop. “The typology of paradise regained” [J].Modern Philology, 1955 (LIII): 227-38.
  • 2Evans J, Martin. John Milton 20th-century perspectives vol. 4paradise lost [C]. New York: Routledge, 2003.
  • 3Kerrigan, William. The Sacred Complex [M]. Cambridge:Harvard UP, 1983.
  • 4Martz, Louis L. Poet of Exile: A study of Milton’s Poetry [M].New Haven: Yale UP, 1980.
  • 5艾略特T S. 基督教与宗教[M]. 杨民生译, 成都: 四川人民出版社, 1989.
  • 6Shawcross, John T. Paradise Regained: Worthy t’ Have NotRemained so Long Unsung [M]. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 1988.
  • 7Tillyard E M W. Milton [M]. New York: Collier, 1966.
  • 8Hughes, Merritt Y. “The Christ of paradise regained and theheroic tradition” [J]. Studies in Philology, 1938 (XXXV):256-277.
  • 9Eliot T S, “Milton” Milton criticism [C]. James Thrope. NewYork: Octagon, 1966.
  • 10Ricks, Christopher. Milton’s Grand Style [M]. Oxford: OxfordUP, 1863.

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部