期刊文献+

急诊预检分诊错误原因分析及整改探讨 被引量:5

Analysis and Rectification of the Cause of Emergency Precheck
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨急诊预检分诊错误原因及整改措施。方法回顾并分析我院急诊科2016年3—12月预检分诊情况。分诊的错误病例为1 591人次,对其进行分类及分析,提出解决的对策。结果总分诊例数为12 873人次,实施整改措施后错误例数1 591人次,错误率为12.36%,实施整改前错误例数为2 682人次,错误率为20.83%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论致使预检分诊产生错误的重要问题是缺少规范性与有效性的量化预检系统相关分诊标准,以及护士缺少专业素养以及缺少充足的业务能力,需要制定整改措施,提高分诊正确率。 Objective To explore the cause and corrective measures of emergency precheck.Methods The pre-inspection of the emergency department of our hospital from March to December2016was reviewed and analyzed.The number of Misdiagnosed cases was1591,which was classified and analyzed,and the countermeasures were put forward.Results The total number was12873cases,1591errors occuring after the implementation of corrective actions,the error rate of12.36%.Before the implementation of the rectification,the number of error cases was2682,and the error rate was20.83%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The important problem of preview triage errors is the lack of normative and effective quantitative preview triage system standard,and a lack of professional nurses and the lack of adequate business ability,need to develop corrective measures to improve the triage accuracy.
作者 卢美珍 毛卫婷 陆彩云 林琳 唐艳红 LU Meizhen;MAO Weiting;LU Caiyun;LIN Lin;TANG Yanhong(Department of Emergency, Nanning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning Guangxi 530001, China)
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2017年第16期19-21,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 急诊 预检 分诊 emergency preview triage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1江观玉,徐少文.急诊管理制度与诊疗常规[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社.2008.
  • 2Pershad J, Water TM. Use of tent for screening during HINI pandemic: impact on quality and cost of care [J] . Pediatr Emerg Care, 2012, 28 (3): 229-235.
  • 3Goswami V, Dutta AK, Singh V, et al. Evaluation of simple clinical signs of illness in young infants (0 -2 months) and its correlation with WHO IMCI algorithm ( 7 days to 2 months ) [ J ] . Indian Pediatr, 2006, 43 (12): 1402-1409.
  • 4Kennedy J, Rhodes K, Wails CA, et al. Access to emergency care : restricted by long waiting times and cost and coverage concerns [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med ,2004,43 ( 5 ) :567-573.
  • 5中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.WS/T390-2012医院急诊科规范化流程[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
  • 6Fernandes CM,Tanabe P, Gilboy N, et. al. Five-level tri- age~a report from the ACEP/ENA five-level triage task force[J]. J Emerg Nurs, 2005,31 (1) .. 39-50.
  • 7Travers DA, Waller AE, Bowling JM, et al. Five-level tri- age system more e{fective than three-level in tertiary e- mergency department EJ~. J Emerg Nuts, 2002, 28 (5) .. 395-400.
  • 8Christ M,Grossmann F, Winter D, et al. Modern triage in the emergency department [J]. Dtsch .5,rztebl Int, 2010, 107(50) :892-898.
  • 9Wuerz RC, Milne LW, Eitel DR, et al. Reliability and va- lidity of a new five-level triage instrument [J]. Aead Emerg Med, 2000,7 (3) : 236-242.
  • 10Gilboy N,Travers D, Wuerz R. Re-evaluating triage in the new millennium: a comprehensive look at the need for standardization and quality]-J~. J Emerg Nuts, 1999,25 (6) .. 468-473.

共引文献50

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部