期刊文献+

Software Defined Networking Based On-Demand Routing Protocol in Vehicle Ad-Hoc Networks 被引量:1

Software Defined Networking Based On-Demand Routing Protocol in Vehicle Ad-Hoc Networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper comes up with a SDN Based Vehicle Ad-Hoc On-Demand Routing Protocol(SVAO),which separates the data forwarding layer and network control layer,as in software defined networking(SDN),to enhance data transmission efficiency within vehicle ad-hoc networks(VANETs).The roadside service unit plays the role of local controller and is in charge of selecting vehicles to forward packets within a road segment.All the vehicles state in the road.Correspondingly,a two-level design is used.The global level is distributed and adopts a ranked query scheme to collect vehicle information and determine the road segments along which a message should be forwarded.On the other hand,the local level is in charge of selecting forwarding vehicles in each road segment determined by the global level.We implement two routing algorithms of SVAO,and compare their performance in our simulation.We compare SVAO with popular ad-hoc network routing protocols,including Optimized Link State Routing(OLSR),Dynamic Source Routing(DSR),Destination Sequence Distance Vector(DSDV),and distance-based routing protocol(DB)via simulations.We consider the impact of vehicle density,speed on data transmission rate and average packet delay.The simulation results show that SVAO performs better than the others in large-scale networks or with high vehicle speeds. This paper comes up with a SDN Based Vehicle Ad-Hoc On-Demand Routing Protocol(SVAO),which separates the data forwarding layer and network control layer,as in software defined networking(SDN),to enhance data transmission efficiency within vehicle ad-hoc networks(VANETs).The roadside service unit plays the role of local controller and is in charge of selecting vehicles to forward packets within a road segment.All the vehicles state in the road.Correspondingly,a two-level design is used.The global level is distributed and adopts a ranked query scheme to collect vehicle information and determine the road segments along which a message should be forwarded.On the other hand,the local level is in charge of selecting forwarding vehicles in each road segment determined by the global level.We implement two routing algorithms of SVAO,and compare their performance in our simulation.We compare SVAO with popular ad-hoc network routing protocols,including Optimized Link State Routing(OLSR),Dynamic Source Routing(DSR),Destination Sequence Distance Vector(DSDV),and distance-based routing protocol(DB)via simulations.We consider the impact of vehicle density,speed on data transmission rate and average packet delay.The simulation results show that SVAO performs better than the others in large-scale networks or with high vehicle speeds.
出处 《ZTE Communications》 2017年第2期11-18,共8页 中兴通讯技术(英文版)
基金 partially supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFB0200400) National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.61379157) Program of Science and Technology of Guangdong(No.2015B010111001) MOE-CMCC Joint Research Fund of China(No.MCM20160104)
关键词 VANETS SDN ROUTING PROTOCOL ad.hoc network Internet of Vehicle VANETs SDN routing protocol ad-hoc network Internet of Vehicle
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献65

  • 1Mckeown N, Anderson T, Balakrishnan H, Parulkar G, Peterson L, Rexford J, Shenker S, Turner J. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2008,38(2):69-74. [doi: 10.1145/1355734. 1355746].
  • 2Elliott C. GENI: Opening up new classes of experiments in global networking. IEEE Internet Computing, 2010,14(1):39-42.
  • 3Gavras A, Karila A, Fdida S, May M, Potts M. Future Internet research and experimentation: The FIRE initiative. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2007,37(3):89-92. [doi: 10.114511273445.1273460].
  • 4JGN2plus. 2012. http://www.jgn.nict.go.jp/english/index.html.
  • 5SOFIA. 2012. http://fi.ict.ac.cn/research/sofia_overview.htm.
  • 6Yang L, Dantu R, Anderson T, Gopal R. Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Framework. RFC 3746, 2004. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3746.
  • 7Greenberg A, Hjalmtysson G, Maltz DA, Myers A, Rexford J, Xie G, Yan H, Zhan J, Zhang H. A clean slate 4D approach to network control and management. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2005,35(5):41-54. [doi: 10.1145/1096536. 1096541].
  • 8Caesar M, Caldwell D, Feamster N, Rexford J, Shaikh A, Merwe J. Design and implementation of a routing control platform. In: Proc. of the 2rd USENIX Symp. on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI). Boston: USENIX Association, 2005. 15-28.
  • 9Casado M, Garfinkel T, Akella A, Freedman MJ, Boneh D, Mckeown N, Shenker S. SANE: A protection architecture for enterprise networks. In: Proc. of the 15th Conf. on USENIX Security Symp. Vancouver: USENIX Association, 2006. 137-151.
  • 10Casado M, Freedman MJ, Pettit J, Luo J, Mckeown N, Shenker S. Ethane: Taking control of the enterprise. In: Proc. of the SIGCOMM 2007. Kyoto: ACM Press, 2007. 1-12. [doi: 10.1145/1282380.1282382].

共引文献420

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部