期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克病人行主动脉内球囊反搏术联合经皮冠状动脉介入术的临床疗效分析 被引量:31

Clinical analysis of intra-aortic balloon bump combined with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克病人行主动脉内球囊反搏术(IABP)联合经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析收治的急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克病人,行急诊PCI治疗病人106例,按照是否采用IABP支持,分为对照组(未行IABP)和观察组(行IABP)。比较两组病人术后2 d时血液动力学变化,3 d时心肌酶学变化,术后3个月时左室射血分数(LVEF)以及左室舒张末径(LVEDD)的变化,3个月内两组病人主要心血管事件发生情况。结果观察组术后2 d的血液动力学指标显著优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后3 d时心肌酶学显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组LVEF在术后3个月显著高于对照组(P<0.05),而LVEDD在术后3个月显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组病人术后3个月时死亡例数显著低于对照组(P<0.05),两组间再发心肌梗死以及血栓形成无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 IABP联合PCI治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克能有效的改善血液动力学指标,减轻心肌细胞损伤,增强心功能,降低病死率。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of intra-aortic balloon bump combined with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.Methods Retrospectively analyzed106patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock from December2014to June2016underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention.According to the use of intra-aortic balloon bump(IABP),the patients were divided into the control group(no IABP)and the observation group(IABP).Compared the changes of hemodynamics after2days,the changes of myocardial enzyme after3days,the changes of left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)and left ventricular end diastolic diameter(LVEDD)at3months after treatment between the two groups.The incidence of major cardiovascular events within3months of two groups were recorded and compared.Results The hemodynamic indexes of observation group were significantly superior to that of control group after2days treatment(P<0.05).The myocardial enzymology on observation group was significantly lower than control group after three days treatment(P<0.05).The observation group left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)after3months surgery were significantly higher than that of control group(P<0.05),while the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD)after3months surgery were significantly better than that of control group(P<0.05).The observation group of death patients with postoperative3months were significantly lower than that of control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference on recurrence of myocardial infarction and thrombosis between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Intra-aortic balloon bump combined with percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock can effectively improve hemodynamic parameters,reduce myocardial injury and enhance cardiac function and reduce mortality.
作者 宁小方 姬富才 NING Xiaofang;JI Fucai(Department of Cardiovascular^Sanmenxia Central Hospital Affiliated To Henan University of Science and Technology ,Samnenxia, Henan 472000, China)
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2017年第8期1442-1445,共4页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 急性心肌梗死 心源性休克 主动脉内球囊反搏术 经皮冠状动脉介人术 临床疗效 Acute myocardial infarction Cardiogenic shock Intra-aortic balloon bump Percutaneous coronary intervention Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1龚兰生,李明洲.心肌梗塞后左心室重构[J].国外医学(内科学分册),1995,22(1):1-5. 被引量:19
  • 2张大鹏,杨新春.心肌组织水平再灌注的研究进展[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(8):762-765. 被引量:11
  • 3Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronanry Intervention(ASSENT-4 PCI)investigators.Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronanry intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction(ASSENT-PCI):randomized trial.Lancet,2006,367:569-578.
  • 4Smith SC,Dove JT,Jacobs AK,et al.ACC/AHA gudlines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA gudlines):executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Gudlines (Committee to Revise the 1993 Gudlines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37:2215-2239.
  • 5Mosca L,Appel LJ,Benjamin EJ,et al.Evidence-based Guideliness for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women.Circulation,2004,109:672-693.
  • 6Sibler S,Chairperson,Albertsson P,et al.Gudlines for percutaneous coronary interventions.The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology.Eur Heart J,2005,26:804-847.
  • 7Granger CB,Goldberg RJ,Dabbous O,et al.Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronanry events.Arch Intern Med,2003,163:2345-2353.
  • 8Ross AM,Coyne KS,Reiner JS,et al.A randomised trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction:the PACT trial.J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34:1954-1962.
  • 9Keeley EC,Boure JA,Grines CL.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.Lancet,2003,361:13-20.
  • 10Bradley EH,Curry LA,Webster TR,et al.Strategies for reducing door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,2006,355:2308-2320.

共引文献80

同被引文献248

引证文献31

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部