期刊文献+

剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产与选择性重复剖宫产母婴安全性的Meta分析 被引量:22

The Safety of Maternal and Perinatal of Trial of Labor after Previous Cesarean Delivery Versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Meta-Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:系统性分析剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产(trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery,TOLAC)与选择性重复剖宫产(elective repeat cesarean delivery,ERCD)的母婴安全性。方法:检索Cochrane临床对照试验数据库(CENTRAL)、Medline、Embase、Ovid、万方数据库、中国知网(CNKI)等数据库。收集1989—2016年有关TOLAC和ERCD的临床研究文献,采用Rev Man 5.2软件对有关数据进行统计分析。结果:共纳入11篇文献,共计91 975例研究对象,其中试验组(TOLAC组)51 428例,对照组(ERCD组)40 547例。TOLAC组发生子宫破裂风险较ERCD组高,差异有统计学意义(RR=2.78,95%CI:1.24~6.22,P=0.01);TOLAC组子宫切除的风险比ERCD组低,差异有统计学意义(RR=0.57,95%CI:0.44~0.74,P<0.000 1);而孕妇产褥感染风险(RR=1.10,95%CI:0.78~1.56,P=0.58)、孕妇输血风险(RR=1.09,95%CI:0.62~1.92,P=0.75)以及孕妇死亡风险(RR=0.71,95%CI:0.26~1.92,P=0.50),2组差异无统计学意义;新生儿窒息(RR=2.30,95%CI:1.74~3.03,P<0.000 01)及围生儿死亡(RR=1.71,95%CI:1.29~2.25,P=0.000 1),TOLAC组均比ERCD组高,差异有统计学意义。结论:在临床上,为了降低剖宫产率,应该鼓励剖宫产术后再次妊娠者进行阴道试产。为了降低相关风险,产前需要进行充分评估,产时严格且规范监测,最大限度保证母婴安全,同时还要合理、科学地评估每次剖宫产的指征。 Objective:The aim of this study was to compare the trial of labor with elective repeat cesarean delivery(ERCD)among women with previous cesarean delivery.Methods:We searched CENTRAL,Medline,Embase,Ovid,Wanfang,CNKI databases about the safety of maternal and perinatal of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery(TOLAC)versus ERCD from1989through2016.Results:Eleven studies with a total of91975women were included.51428women undergoing TOLAC,40547women undergoing ERCD.Uterine rupture occurred more frequently among women undergoing TOLAC than among those undergoing ERCD(RR=2.78,95%CI:1.24~6.22,P=0.01).Mothers undergoing TOLAC were less likely to have hysterectomy(RR=0.57,95%CI:0.44~0.74,P<0.0001).There were no differences in maternal puerperal infection(RR=1.10,95%CI:0.78~1.56,P=0.58),require transfusion(RR=1.09,95%CI:0.62~1.92,P=0.75)and maternal mortality(RR=0.71,95%CI:0.26~1.92,P=0.50)risk between the2groups.Asphyxia of newborn(RR=2.30,95%CI:1.74~3.03,P<0.00001)and fetal or neonatal death(RR=1.71,95%CI:1.29~2.25,P=0.0001)were more frequent in the TOLAC group than the control group.Conclusions:In order to reduce the rate of cesarean section,we should encourage TOLAC.Its security is very important,which required adequate prenatal assessment,strict and standardized monitoring of the delivery process for the maximum guarantee of maternal and child safety,but also a reasonable and scientific assessment of each cesarean section indications is necessary.
作者 陈红晓 田秀芳 CHEN Hong-xiao;TIAN Xiu-fang(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Fifth Center Hospital, Tianjin 300450, China)
出处 《国际妇产科学杂志》 CAS 2017年第4期430-435,共6页 Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 剖宫产后阴道分娩 自然分娩 剖宫产术 手术后期间 子宫 瘢痕 子宫破裂 META分析 Vaginal birth after cesarean Natural childbirth Cesarean section Postoperative period Uterus Cicatrix Uterine rupture Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献46

  • 1汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:8
  • 2Walker R, Turnbu11 D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence[J]. Birth, 2002,29:28-39.
  • 3Betrdn AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates[l]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2007,21:98-113.
  • 4C6ceres IA, Arcaya M, Declercq E, et al. Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US)2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8:e57817.
  • 5Blumenthal NJ, Harris RS, O'Connor MC,et al. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1984, 24: 246-251.
  • 6Long Q, Klemetti R, Wang Y, et al. High Caesarean section rate in rural China: is it related to health insurance (New Co- operative Medical Scheme)? [J]. Soc Sei Med, 2012, 75:733- 737.
  • 7Leung GM, Lam TH, Thach TQ, et al. Rates of cesarean births in Hong Kong: 1987-1999[J]. Birth, 2001,28:166-172.
  • 8Wu WL. Cesarean delivery in Shantou, China: a retrospective analysis of 1922 women[J]. Birth, 2000,27: 86-90.
  • 9Cai WW, Marks JS, Chen CH, et al. Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China[J]. Am J Public Health, 1995,88:777-750.
  • 10Tang S, Li X, Wu Z. Rising caesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: evidence from three nationwide household health surveys[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006,195:1527-1532.

共引文献540

同被引文献195

引证文献22

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部