期刊文献+

高龄冠心病患者介入治疗的安全性及有效性评价 被引量:4

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of interventional therapy for elderly patients with coronary heart disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价高龄冠心病(年龄≥75岁)患者接受介入治疗的有效性及安全性。方法:收治接受冠脉介入治疗的冠心病患者208例。按年龄分高龄组(年龄≥75岁)52例和非高龄组(年龄<75岁)156例。比较两组冠脉病变情况、即刻手术成功率、完全血运重建率、手术相关并发症、院内死亡率。结果:高龄组女性比例,合并高血压、糖尿病、肾功不全比例,ACS发生率均高于非高龄组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。高龄组多支病变比例、C型病变比例高于非高龄组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。高龄组完全血运重建率明显低于非高龄组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:高龄冠心病患者进行PCI治疗是安全、有效的,但其完全血运重建比例明显减少。 Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of interventional therapy for elderly patients(age≥75years old)with coronaryheart disease.Methods:208patients with coronary heart disease treated by interventional therapy were selected.According tothe age group,they were divided into the elderly group(age≥75years)in52cases and the non-elderly group(age<75years)in156cases.The coronary lesion,immediate operative success,complete revascularization rate,operative complications and in-hospitalmortality were compared between groups.Results:The ratio of female,combined with hypertension,diabetes,renal insufficiency andACS in the elderly group were higher than those in the non elderly group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The proportion of multivessel disease and type C lesion in the elderly group was higher than that in the non elderly group,and thedifference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The rate of complete revascularization in the elderly group was significantly lowerthan that in the non elderly group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:It is safe and effective forPCI treatment in elderly patients with coronary heart disease.But the proportion of complete revascularization is significantly reduced.
作者 罗晓娟 林琦 Luo Xiaojuan;Lin Qi(Department of Cardiology,the Seventh People's Hospital of Chengdu,610041)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2017年第24期22-23,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 高龄 冠心病 冠状动脉介入治疗 Advanced age Coronary heart disease Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1Bounhoure JP,Carrie D,Puel J.Coronary syndromes in the elderly[J].Bull Acad Natl Med,2006;190(4-5):873-6.
  • 2Seto TB,Taira DA,Berezin R,et al.Percutaneous coronary revascularization in elderly patients:impact on functional status and quality of life[J].Ann Intern Med,2000;132(12):955-8.
  • 3Ryan TJ,Bauman WB,Kennedy JW.Revised guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty)[J].Circulation,1993;88:2987-3007.
  • 4Schampaert E,Cohen EA,Schluter M,et al.The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS)[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2004;43:1116-27.
  • 5Peterson E,Alexander K,Malenka DJ,et al.Multicenter experience in revascularization of very elderly[J].Am Heart J,2004;148(3):486-92.
  • 6Yan BP,Gurvitch R,Duffy SJ,et al.An evaluation of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2007;70(7):944-5.
  • 7Voudris VA,Skoularigis JS,Malakos JS,et al.Long-term clinical outcome of coronary artery stenting in elderly patients[J].Coronary Artery Dis,2002;13(6):323-9.
  • 8Shirakabe A,Takano H,Nakamura S,et al.Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Int Heart,2007; 48(1):1-9.
  • 9Fasseas P,Orford JL,Panetta CJ,et al.Incidence,correlates,management,and clinical outcome of coronary perforation:analysis of 16,298 procedures[J].Am Heart,2004;147(1):140-5.
  • 10Fuster V,Moreno PR,Fayad ZA,et al.Atherothrombosis and high risk plaque:part I:evolving concepts[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2005;46(6):937-54.

共引文献40

同被引文献46

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部