期刊文献+

I-gel喉罩对妇科腹腔镜手术患者呼吸功能的影响 被引量:2

Safety evaluation of I-gel laryngeal mask airway used in laparoscopic gynecological operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较I-gel喉罩与气管插管在妇科腹腔镜手术中对患者呼吸功能的影响。方法择期全麻下妇科腹腔镜手术患者80例,随机分为两组,在全麻诱导后分别采用喉罩(I)组和气管插管(T)组行机械通气,记录气腹前、后10 min、15 min呼气末CO_2(PETCO_2),气道平台压(Palat)、气道峰压(Ppeak)和肺顺应性(CL),并记录术后不良反应发生情况。结果气腹后10 min、15min,I组CL明显高于T组,Palat,Ppeak明显低于T组(P<0.05)。与气腹前比较,气腹后10 min、15 min,两组CL明显降低,PETCO_2,Pplat,Ppeak明显升高(P<0.01)。I组术后咽喉痛和呛咳的例数明显少于T组(P<0.05)。结论妇科腹腔镜手术中采用I-gel喉罩通气更安全,不良反应更少。 Objective To compare the influence on anesthesia and respiratory function in patients using I-gel laryngeal mask or tracheal intubation under general anesthesia in laparoscopicgynecological operation.Methods Eighty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological operation surgery were randomly divided to2groups(each40cases):laryngeal mask group(group I)and tracheal intubation group(group T).During surgery was maintained by intravenous medication and mechanical ventilation.PETCO2,Pplat,Ppeak,lung compliance(at3time points:before pneumoperitoneum,10minutes,15minutes after Pneumoperitoneum)and complications(sore throat,hoarse voice,bucking,nausea and vomitting)were re corded.Results Before pneumoperitoneum,there was no significant difference of airway resistance between group I and group T.After pneumoperitoneum,the decrease of airway resistance was observed in group S compared with group T(P<0.05).Less complications was observed in group S compared with group T(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with tracheal intubation,I-gel laryngeal mask ventilation is safe and effective during laparoscopic gynecological operation.
作者 张爱萍 许旭东 潘春英 Zhang Ai-ping;Xu Xu-dong;Pan Chun-ying(Department of Anesthesiogy, Changzhou City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213000, China)
出处 《当代医学》 2017年第24期6-8,共3页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 I-gel喉罩 气管插管 妇科腹腔镜手术 Laryngeal mask Tracheal intubation Laparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1岳云,主译.喉罩麻醉原理与实践.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:579-580.
  • 2岳云,田鸣,左明章,等主译.喉罩麻醉原理与实践[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:264.
  • 3Gabbott DA,Beringer R.The iGEL supraglottic airway:a potential role for resuscitation?Resuscitation,2007,73(1):161-162.
  • 4Hooshangi H,Wong DT.Brief review:the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway(Cobra PLA)and the Streamlined Liner of Pharyngeal Airway(SLIPA)supraglottic airways.Can J Anaesth,2008,55(3):177-185.
  • 5岳云,田鸣,左云章.喉罩麻醉原理与实践.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:516-518.
  • 6Bamgbade OA, Macnab WR, Khalaf WM. Evaluation of the i-gel air-way in 300 patients. Eur J Anaesthesio1,2008,25 : 865-866.
  • 7Vanzundert TCRV, Brimacombe JR. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA- Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Acta Anesth Belg, 2012,63 : 35 41.
  • 8Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia,2008, 63:1124-1130.
  • 9Chauhan G, Nayar P, Seth A, et al. Comparison of clinical perfonance of the I-gel with LMA proseal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmaco1,2013 ,29 :56-60.
  • 10Teoh WH,Lee KM,Suhitharan T,et al. Comparison of theLMA supreme VS the I-gel in paralysed patients undergo-ing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlledventilation[ J]. Anaesthesia,2010,65( 12) : 1173-1179.

共引文献48

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部