“相互独立”还是“密切联系”——从刑事附带民事诉讼的模式分析看其完善路径

“Mutual Independence” or “Close Connection” ——The way to perfect civil suit collateral to criminal proceedings through analyzing its patterns

"先刑后民"的刑事附带民事诉讼模式自首次得到我国刑诉法的确认至今已将近四十年。随着时代的发展,这种模式与我国司法实践的冲突也日益明显。为了解决"先刑后民"模式所找带来的问题,"刑民分离"模式和"先民后刑"模式应运而生。但是,"刑民分离"模式本身的一系列缺陷表明其不可能取代现行的"附带"模式。因此,我国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的完善路径应当是结合"先民后刑"模式和"先刑后民"模式的可取之处,对当前的审理方式进行重构,以满足我国司法实践的现实需求。

It has been almost forty years since the“criminal law before civil law”pattern was firstconfirmed by our country’s criminal procedure law.And with the days going by,the conflict between thispattern and the juridical practice seems to get sharper and sharper.In order to solve this mess,the“separation of criminal and civil law”mode and the“civil law before criminal law”mode come up oneafter another.The first pattern of both,however,has proved its inability to replace the“collateralization”mode because of numerous problems waiting to be dealt with.Therefore,the most ideal route to perfectthe system of civil suit collateral to criminal proceedings is to reconstitute the current way of hearingwhile adopting the advantages of the above two specific types of“collateralization”pattern.In theresponse,the needs of juridical practice will also be fully meet.