期刊文献+

三医联动推广腹膜透析 优化终末期肾病治疗 被引量:4

Popularizing PD Treatment for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients through “Tripartite Reform in Health System”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 终末期肾病患者只能依靠维持性治疗(包括肾透析和肾移植抗排异)生存,治疗费用高昂。应优先选择直接与间接医疗费用低、治疗效果优、社会回归程度高的经济适宜技术,以减轻患者和社会负担。研究发现,腹膜透析具备上述技术优势,但由于医护人员激励不足而不被临床优先选择。应通过三医联动改革的方式,规范临床操作的技术路径,对诊疗服务项目合理定价,在绩效考核中激励医护人员应用适宜透析技术,并通过医保支付方式优化予以制度保障,联动破解"因病致贫"。 The maintenance treatment for End-Stage Renal Disease,including dialysis and kidney transplant anti-rejection therapy,costs high.To reduce the economic burden on patient and society,the therapy method with the advantage of low direct and indirect costs,good treatment effects,and high returning to society should be recommended as fi rst choice.Peritoneal dialysis is the one with all mentioned advantage.However,because of low payment and award,doctors and nurses didn’t take PD as fi rst.Trough“Tripartite reform in health system”,including standardizing the technical path in clinical operation,pricing medical service reasonably,incenting doctors and nurses to provide PD fi rst via KPI,and optimizing the health insurance system,PD will be popularized.Via the“Tripartite reform in health system”for PD treatment,poverty caused by disease will decrease.
作者 梁鸿 王文仪 芦炜 袁丽 Liang Hong;Wang Wenyi;Lu Wei;Yuan Li(School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433;School of Economy and Management, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158)
出处 《中国医疗保险》 2017年第9期29-33,共5页 China Health Insurance
关键词 腹膜透析 三医联动 终末期肾病 peritoneal dialysis tripartite reform in health system end-stage renal disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1金春林,胡善联,邵浩奇.终末期肾病治疗的成本效果分析回顾[J].国外医学(卫生经济分册),1993,10(1):5-10. 被引量:3
  • 2马祖等,郑智华,张涤华,郝元涛,叶任高,娄探奇,毛晓玲,刘岩,刘冠贤,朱起之,张增华,汪华林,傅君舟,余学清.血液透析和腹膜透析患者生存质量的多中心调查[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2004,20(6):400-405. 被引量:87
  • 3朱晓峰,张金元,许龙根,张兰,阎利,乐园罗.终末期肾病维持性血液透析患者生活质量及相关因素研究[J].中国血液净化,2005,4(6):310-313. 被引量:41
  • 4吴晶,李洪超,阎丽静,刘国恩.终末期肾脏病透析治疗产出研究综述[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(3):74-78. 被引量:8
  • 5Just P. Economic evaluations of dialysis modalities[J].Health Policy, 2008(86): 163-180.
  • 6Sennfalt K, Magnusson M, Carlsson P. Comparison of hemodialysis and periloneal dialysis: a cost-utility analysis[J]. Periloneal Dialysis International, 2002(22):39-47.
  • 7Knrevaar J C, Feith G W, Dekker F W, et al. Effect of stalling with hemndialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis in patients new on dialysis treatment: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Kidney Int, 2003(64):2222-2228.
  • 8Macleod A. Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease: systematie reviews [J]. Health Technology Assessment, 1998(2):5.
  • 9Hooi 1,. Economic evaluation of center hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Minisll7 of' Health hospitals in Malaysia[J]. Nephrology, 2005,10(1):25-32.
  • 10Pacheco A. Cost/utility study of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in Chile[J]. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 2007(27):359-363.

共引文献46

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部