期刊文献+

舒芬太尼与瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉用于神经外科手术效果与安全性的系统评价 被引量:5

Systematic review of the effect and safety of sufentanil and remifentanil combined with propofol for total intravenous anesthesia in department of neurosurgery operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨舒芬太尼与瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉用于神经外科的手术效果与安全性。方法:选择神经外科患者60例,随机分为对照组和观察组。对照组采用瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉,观察组采用舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉,比较两组麻醉效果。结果:对照组苏醒时间、拔管时间均明显少于观察组(P<0.05);观察组疼痛程度明显轻于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼对患者的麻醉效果均较好,瑞芬太尼能加快患者苏醒,舒芬太尼能明显减轻患者痛苦。 Objective:To explore the effect and safety of sufentanil and remifentanil combined with propofol for total intravenousanesthesia in department of neurosurgery operation.Methods:60patients in department of neurosurgery were selected.They wererandomly divided into the control group and the observation group.The control group was given remifentanil combined withpropofol anesthesia,and the observation group was given sufentanil combined with propofol anesthesia.We compared theanesthetic effects between groups.Results:In the control group,the recovery time and extubation time were significantly less thanthose in the observation group(P<0.05);the degree of pain in the observation group was significantly lighter than the controlgroup(P<0.05).Conclusion:The anesthetic effects of remifentanil and sufentanil were all better.Remifentanil can accelerate therecovery of patients,and sufentanil can obviously alleviate the pain of patients.
作者 林伦刚 Lin Lungang(The People's Hospital of Zhenxiong County,Zhaotong City,Yunnan Province 657200)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2017年第27期53-54,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 瑞芬太尼 舒芬太尼 丙泊酚 全凭静脉麻醉 Remifentanil Sufentanil Propofol Total intravenous anesthesia
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献22

  • 1陈新忠,王保国,康孝荣,韩如泉,江涛,张建伟,张忠.大脑皮质功能区手术唤醒试验中异丙酚复合舒芬太尼或瑞芬太尼麻醉的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(9):813-817. 被引量:38
  • 2孙大新.颅内手术中异丙酚联合不同阿片类药物持续静脉输注的疗效比较[J].全科医学临床与教育,2007,5(1):30-33. 被引量:4
  • 3The American Society of Anesthesiology.ASA Physical Status Clas-sification System.Available from:https://www.asahq.org.
  • 4Higgins JPT,Green S (editors).Cochrane Handbook for SystematicReviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [Updated March 2011].TheCochrane Collaboration,2011.Available from:www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 5Martorano PP,Aloj F,Baietta S,et al.Sufentanil-propofol vsremifentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neuro-surgery.A multicentre study.Minerva Anestesiologica,2008,74(6):233-243.
  • 6Bilotta F,Caramia R,Paoloni FP,et al.Early postoperative cogni-tive recovery after remifentanil-propofol or sufentanil-propofolanaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy:a randomized trial.Eur JAnaesthesioly 2007,24(2):122-127.
  • 7Gerlach K,Uhlig T,Hiippe M,et al.Remifentanil-propofol versussufentanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy:arandomized trial.Eur J Anaesthesioli 2003,20(10):813-820.
  • 8Ahonen J,Olkkola KT,Hynynenm,et al.Comparison of alfentanil,fentanil and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propo-fol in patients undergoing coronary artery by-pass surgery.Br JAnaestK 2000,85(4):533-540.
  • 9Meaudre E,Borer H,Suppini A,et al Sufentanil supplementation ofsevoflurane during induction of anaesthesia:a randomized study.EurJAnaesthesiol,2004,21(10):793-796.
  • 10Fabregas N,Bruder N.Recovery and neurological evaluation.BestPractice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology,2007,21(4):431-447.

共引文献93

同被引文献26

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部