贫困治理行政主导与社会协同的合作之路

The Path of Cooperation between Administrative-oriented and Social Collaboration in Poverty Governance

贫困治理成效是判断全面小康社会建成与否的核心标志。十八大以来,脱贫攻坚可谓成绩斐然。在赞许行政主导所取得现实绩效的同时,也要看到贫困治理对社会协同的历史诉求。囿于行政权力集中性与统一性的偏好,在治理实践中难免存在一些潜在风险。结合"田东模式"与"郝堂试验"的治理实践,阐述了行政主导下的市场路径与社会路径中的行动者构成与合作化过程。为避免行政主导的潜在风险、培育社会反贫困的内生动力、实现贫困治理的可持续性,需要在"上—下""内—外"的双向沟通机制、"直接—间接"互惠的激励机制及"资本—资产"的互通机制等方面,进一步提升政府主导下政府、市场与社会的合作化水平。

The effect of poverty governance is the core symbol for building a moderately prosperous societyin all respects.Poverty governance has made significant achievements since the18th congress of the CommunistParty of China.We must be also aware of the historical appeal of poverty governance to social collaborationwhile praising the achievements of administrative-oriented.There are some potential risks in governancepractice due to the preference of concentration and unification of administrative power.Combining with thepractice of“Tian Dong model”and“Hao Tang test”,the paper stated the market path ofadministrative-oriented and the social path of the actors in the composition and cooperation process.In order toavoid the potential risks of administrative-oriented,cultivate the endogenous power of social anti-poverty andrealize the sustainability of poverty governance,it is necessary to construct the government communicationmechanism of“up-down”and“internal-external”,“direct-indirect”incentive mechanism and the exchangemechanism of“capital-assets”,and further improve the degree of cooperation between government,market andsociety.