期刊文献+

IRAC分析法在公安法学教学中的应用研究 被引量:1

The Application of IRAC Method in Public Security Law Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公安院校法学教学坚持以实战化为导向,而现有的法学教学模式中仍存在不足亟需完善。提高公安法学教学的有效性,需要对法学教学方式进行改革与探索。IRAC分析法作为对案例教学法的补充和延伸,能够有效帮助学生掌握法律分析与论证能力,有利于学生法治思维的形成与法律逻辑的建构,符合应用型人才的培养要求。IRAC分析法在具体应用中需要教师的高素质与专业化,鼓励学生多角度思考、多层次论证以达到高质量的教学效果。 Law education in public security insists on the combat teaching.However,there are still some deficiencies in the existing law teaching mode,which need to be improved urgently.To improve the teaching effectiveness,we need to reform and explore the teaching methods of law.As a supplement to the case teaching method,IRAC method can effectively help students grasp the ability of legal analysis and demonstration,and help students form the rule of law thinking and the construction of legal logic,in line with the training requirements of application-oriented talents.IRAC method needs the high quality and specialization of the teacher in the application.It can achieve the high quality teaching effect by encouraging students to think from several different angles,and to prove in multi-levelly.
作者 宋潮 SONG Chao(Law Department, Jiangsu Police Institute, Nanjing Jiangsu 210031, China)
出处 《辽宁警察学院学报》 2017年第6期106-109,共4页 Journal of Liaoning Police College
基金 江苏警官学院2015年度科学研究项目(2015SJYSQ03) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) "十三五"江苏省重点建设学科建设工程资助项目 江苏高校品牌专业建设工程资助项目(TAPP)
关键词 教学方法 IRAC分析法 应用 teaching method IRAC method application
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1王晨光.理论与实践:围绕法学教育的难题之一[J].中外法学,1998,10(6):76-82. 被引量:89
  • 2Charles R. Calleros, Legal Methods and Writing, 4^th ed. , Aspen Publishers, 2002. p. 69-95.
  • 3Charles R. Calleros, Legal Methods and Writing, 4^th ed. , Aspen Publishers, 2002. p. 73.
  • 4四川省泸州市纳溪区人民法院民事判决书[(2001)纳溪民初字第561号].
  • 5http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/irac.html.最后访问时间为2010年3月18日.
  • 6Nicholas Reseher. Dialectics: A Controversy - Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press. 1977. p. 43.
  • 7熊明辉.《法律论证的逻辑分析》,中山大学博士论文,2007年,第6页.
  • 8Douglas N. Walton. Legal Argumentation and Evidence. the Pennsylvania State University Press. 2002. p151.
  • 9Douglas N. Walton. Legal Argumentation and Evidence. the Pennsylvania State University Press. 2002. p. 153.
  • 10Douglas N. Walton. Legal Argumentation and Evidence. the Pennsylvania State University Press. 2002. p1.

共引文献115

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部