论“公开盗窃”理论的合理性

On Rationality of “Public Theft” Theory

在我国的传统理论中,"隐蔽获得"是盗窃罪客观行为模式的通说。随着时间的推移,各种新型盗窃举动层出不穷,透露出了以"隐蔽和公开"为标准区分盗窃和抢夺这一观点的很多缺点;盗窃是以非法管领别人财物为目的,平和的在背离他人意志的情况下,转移别人财物占有的举动;盗窃可以隐蔽进行,也可以公开实施;对别人贴身管领的物实施有形力,并具有致人伤亡可能性的举动才是抢夺;盗窃和抢夺的区别在于:举动是否为对物有形力,而且该有形力是否能够致使别人伤亡。

In Chinese traditional theory,“secret acquisition”is the common theory of objective behavior patterns of theft.As time goes on,various new types of theft behavior emerge one after another,revealing a good many defects differing theft and plunder according to whether the behavior is secret or public.Theft aims to occupy other people's property illegally and transfers the property against the will of others secretly.Plunder implements visible force to other people's personal property and with the possible death or injury,which might be done secretly or publicly.Therefore,the difference between theft and plunder should be whether the behavior has visible force and whether the force might cause others death.