木山先生“野草论”的“有限”

“Limitations ”of Hideo Kiyama's Study of LU-Xun's Wild Grass

木山英雄先生的"野草论"大有可商榷之处,"鲁迅像"可能存在的某种偏离(关乎鲁迅心内可确信之理想的有无),他的这种偏离给他的"野草论"带来的方向性屏障。这一方向性屏障限制了"木山野草论"的深度整一性,留下了启发与遗憾共在的"矛盾现况":鲁迅年过不惑而重审"战斗者自我"、意欲厘定自我存在根据的《野草》,其整体意义上的对极性往复运动,虽相互关联,持续提升,却最终不见终极的核心或是目标——但是,木山先生又始终意识到《野草》之于鲁迅"战斗者自我"的形成是有其不可或缺的内在作用的。

Mr Hideo Kiyama’s Wild Grass studies can be discussed What I talk about includes his somewhat deviated“Lu Xun Image”and the obstacle which is caused by his“Lu Xun Image”The barrier limits his Wild Grass studies on the depth of a whole and leads to the contradictory state both inspiring and regrettable:In the whole sense,Wild Grass created by Lu Xun when he was more than40years old and intend to rely on it to review the“combatant-self”to determine the basis of self existence implicates the polar reciprocating movement which is although related to each other,continues to improve,but ultimately not the ultimate core or goal--In spite of this,Mr Kiyama has been aware of the indispensable role of Wild Grass in the formation of Lu Xun’s“combatant ego”