左翼文学批评的裂隙:1932年《地泉》批判再解读

The Conflict of Left-wing Literary Criticism: A Reinterpretation of Criticism of Underground Spring in 1932

1932年的《地泉》批判在一致的表象下潜藏着诸多裂隙。由于批评者身份与学识上的差异,更由于其写序时的心态与关注点的不同,几篇序言之间甚至形成了一种对话关系,充满了批评与反批评。华汉的自序使得那些潜藏在表面的一致之下的诸多差异得以显现。这种差异、错位与裂隙,揭示出左翼文学批评的深层逻辑,即重内容轻形式与浓厚的政治焦虑,而对革命文学作品的"浪漫谛克"的形式的关注,不过是一个虚幻的聚焦点。

The criticism of Underground Spring in1932contained many conflicts under the same image.Because of the difference in identity,knowledge,mentality and focus of the critics,there is a dialogic relationship between the prefaces which are full of criticism and anti-criticism.The preface written by Hua Han makes the difference under the same image appear.The difference,dislocation and fracture,reveals the deep logic of left-wing literary criticism,which demonstrates an obvious inclination of the emphasis on content rather than form and strong political anxiety.The attention on romantic form of revolutionary literary works,is just a fantastic focus.