期刊文献+

SMILE与FS-LASIK术后眼压和角膜生物力学指标的变化比较 被引量:9

Comparison of IOP and corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and FS-LASIK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(small incision lenticule extraction,SMILE)、飞秒辅助LASIK术(FS-LASIK)两种手术方式术后眼压和角膜生物力学指标的变化。方法:选取我院自愿接受SMILE手术101例202眼和FSLASIK手术101例202眼近视患者,分别于术前、术后1mo应用眼反应分析仪(ocular response analyzer,ORA)检测角膜补偿眼压(corneal compensated intraocular pressure,IOPcc)、模拟Goldmann眼压(Goldmann correlated IOP value,IOPg)、角膜阻力因子(corneal resistance factor,CRF)、角膜滞后量(corneal hysteresis,CH)。比较术后1mo与术前测量值的差异,两组CRF、CH降低值的差异。结果:术后1mo SMILE组IOPcc、IOPg分别为13.84±2.22、10.81±2.52mmHg,较术前16.15±2.90、15.95±3.08mmHg显著降低(t=-13.58、-32.91,均P<0.01)。CRF、CH术后测量值7.52±1.41、8.66±1.19mmHg较术前10.72±1.61、10.60±1.43mmHg显著降低(t=-41.21、-24.03,均P<0.01)。CRF、CH分别较术前降低3.19±1.10、1.93±1.14mmHg。FS-LASIK组术后1mo IOPcc、IOPg分别为13.99±2.33、10.10±2.55mmHg,较术前15.88±3.29、14.86±3.34mmHg显著降低(t=-10.09、-23.00,均P<0.01)。CRF、CH术后测量值6.68±1.14、7.90±1.27mmHg较术前9.93±1.85、9.98±1.60mmHg显著降低(t=-24.84、-18.90,均P<0.01)。CRF、CH分别较术前降低3.25±1.86、2.08±1.57mmHg。CRF、CH术后降低值SMILE组显著小于FS-LASIK组(t=-0.351、-1.081,均P<0.01)。结论:两种手术方式术后角膜生物力学和眼压测量值均较术前显著降低。CRF、CH术后降低值,SMILE组显著低于FS-LASIK组。 AIM:To evaluate the influence on corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)and Femto LDV laser flapping in laser in situ keratomileusis(FS-LASIK).METHODS:Preoperatively,1mo after surgery,101patients(202eyes)with myopia in each group respectively by SMILE and FS-LASIK were examined by ocular response analyzer(ORA).Parameters were compared between postoperative(1mo)and preoperative.Comparisons included the corneal thickness and corneal compensated intraocular pressure(lopcc),Goldmann correlated IOP value(lopg),corneal resistance factor(CRF),corneal hysteresis(CH).RESULTS:SMILE group:lOPcc,lOPg(1mo postoperatively,13.84±2.22,10.81±2.52mmHg)significantly changed comparing with preoperative(16.15±2.90,15.95±3.08mmHg;f=-13.58,-32.91;both P<0.01).CRF and CH(1mo postoperatively,7.52±1.41,8.66±1.19mmHg)significantly changed comparing with preoperative(10.72±1.61,10.60±1.43;f=-41.21,-24.03;both P<0.01).The difference were3.19±1.10,1.93±1.14mmHg respectively.FS-LASIK group:lopcc and lopg(1mo postoperatively,13.99±2.33,10.10±2.55mmHg)significantly changed comparing with preoperative(15.88±3.29,14.86±3.34mmHg;f=-10.09、-23.00;both P<0.01).CRF,CH(1mo postoperaturely,6.68±1.14,7.90±1.27mmHg)significantly changed comparing with preoperative(9.93±1.85,9.98±1.60mmHg;r=-24.84,-18.90;both P<0.01).The difference were3.25±1.86,2.08±1.57mmHg respectively.Changes of CRF and CH were significantly different between two groups(t=-0.351,-1.081;both P<0.01).CONCLUSION:The postoperative corneal biomechanics and IOP measurements are lower than preoperative.SMILE are lower than FS-lasik in changes of CRF,CH.
作者 李福生 陶冶 尹鸿芝 汪丽 周跃华 Fu-Sheng Li;Ye Tao;Hong-Zhi Yin;Li Wang;Yue-Hua Zhou(Department of Ming Vision Ophthalmology,Beijing 100062,China;Tongren Eye Center,Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第1期185-187,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 飞秒激光 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术 角膜生物力学 femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction corneal biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Li H,Sun T,Wang M,Zhao J. Safety and effectiveness of thinflap LASIK using a femtosecond laser and microkeratome in the correction of high myopia in Chinese patients[J].Journal of Refractive Surgery,2010,(02):99-106.
  • 2Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer[J].Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery,2005,(02):156-162.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
  • 3王勤美.屈光手术学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,2004100.
  • 4Ou RJ,Shaw EL,Glasgow BJ. Keratoectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK):evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thickness[J].American Journal of Ophthalmology,2002,(05):771-773.
  • 5Lee DH,Seo S,Jeong KW,Shin SC,Vukich JA. Early spatial changes in the posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis[J].Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery,2003,(04):778-784.doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01842-4.
  • 6Chen MC,Lee N,Bourla N,Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis[J].Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery,2008,(11):1886-1891.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.035.
  • 7Hamilton DR,Johnson RD,Lee Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser[J].Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery,2008,(12):2049-2056.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.021.
  • 8Lim L,Gazzard G,Chan YH,Fong A,Kotecha A,Sim EL. Cornea biomechanical charactrristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children[J].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,2008,(09):3852-3857.
  • 9Brubaker RF. Tonometry and corneal thickness[J].Archives of Ophthalmology,1999,(l):104-105.
  • 10何燕玲,元力,黎晓新,胡亦文.Pentacam系统对LASIK手术前后眼压测量值的修正[J].眼科研究,2009,27(1):67-70. 被引量:8

共引文献32

同被引文献83

引证文献9

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部