摘要
设立法官遴选委员会和惩戒委员会是司法改革的重要举措。由于缺乏中央层面统一设计,导致实践运作模式上存在较大差异,产生了遴选(惩戒)委员会合并设置与遴选、惩戒委员会分设两种机制。两种机制各有利弊,产生的实际效果也不尽相同。文章通过对法官遴选、惩戒委员会两种不同的机构设置模式进行探讨,进而论证机构设置的优化选择方案,以期为科学合理地设置法官遴选、惩戒委员会做出有益探索。
The establishment of the selection committee and disciplinary board of judgers are important initiatives for judicial reform,since,as a totally updated one in the recent judicial reform,the mechanism of judgersselection and disciplinary approaches caught the publics attention again.The lack of operational experience makes the pilot project be a sound choice and thus,as a result of limited guidance standard,the operation shows significant differences and results into two different solution:merger or branching.This article took a subjective look at the installing mode of these two institutions and the optimization of that,discussed how to organize these institutions in a more rational way,which might consolidate the judicial reform.
作者
邓小兵
郭秉贵
DENG Xiao bing;GUO Bing gui(Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China)
出处
《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》
2017年第5期49-54,共6页
Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)
基金
甘肃省法学会第七届理事会重大研究课题"司法责任制度研究--以甘肃为考察对象"资助
关键词
司法改革
遴选委员会
惩戒委员会
分设机制
合并机制
judicial reform
selection committee
disciplinary board
branching and combination mechanism