期刊文献+

负压封闭引流术(VSD)治疗一期缝合伤口的临床观察 被引量:3

Clinical effects of vacuum sealing srainage(VSD)in the treament of primary closure wounds
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察负压封闭引流术(VSD)治疗一期缝合伤口的临床效果。方法以2014年8月—2016年12月海南省乐东县第二人民医院创伤骨科收治的68例一期缝合的污染伤口患者为观察对象,按照随机数字表法随机分为治疗组(34例)与对照组(34例)。治疗组患者伤口采用VSD治疗,对照组患者伤口采用常规换药治疗,对比两组患者在术后伤口感染率、住院天数、伤口愈合等级方面的差异。结果治疗组术后伤口感染率明显低于对照组(P=0.040),住院天数明显低于对照组(P<0.05),愈合等级明显高于对照组(P=0.003),差异具有统计学意义。结论 VSD治疗一期缝合伤口与常规换药相比,明显降低了伤口感染率,缩短了愈合时间,减少了住院天数,提高了伤口愈合等级,在临床上具有使用价值。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of primary closure wounds. Methods Sixty-eight patients with primary closure contaminated wounds treated at Department of Traumatic Orthopedics of The Second People's Hospital of Hainan province Ledong County from August 2014 to December 2016 were divided into a treatment group(34 cases)and a control group(34 cases)by using random number table method.The treatment group was given the treatment of vacuum sealing drainage(VSD),and the control group was given conventional wound dressing change.Then the differences in postoperative wound infection rate,hospital duration as well as the wound healing grades were compared between the two groups. Results In the treatment group,the rate of postoperative wound infection was lower than that of the control group(P =0.040),and the hospital duration of treatment group was lower than that of the control group(P <0.05),and the wound healing grade of treatment group was obviously superior to control group(P =0.003),the differences had statistical significance. Conclusion Compared with conventional wound dressing change,VSD has significant advantages of decreasing the rate of wound infection and shortening the healing time evidently and decreasing hospital duration as well as improving healing grade,which has clinical value of application.
出处 《右江民族医学院学报》 2017年第5期349-351,共3页 Journal of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities
基金 2017年中国红十字基金会资助科研课题(项目批准号:中国红基会[2017]188号)
关键词 负压封闭引流术 一期缝合 污染伤口 感染率 住院天数 愈合等级 vacuum sealing drainage primary closure contaminated wounds infection rate hospital duration healing grade
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献91

  • 1章安庆.外科手术切口脂肪液化的原因和防治[J].腹部外科,2004,17(5):300-300. 被引量:58
  • 2陈巧玲,禤焕霞,黄萍.应用封闭式负压引流技术治疗大面积感染创面的观察及护理[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(10):113-115. 被引量:123
  • 3朱毅,董津生.腹部手术切口脂肪液化的危险因素分析及防治[J].职业与健康,2006,22(21):1883-1884. 被引量:19
  • 4龚志军,任镜清,孔刚,刘虹,梁永全,卿笃桔.腹部切口脂肪液化危险因素的Logistic回归分析[J].广东医学,2007,28(3):429-431. 被引量:72
  • 5裘华德,宋九宏.负压封闭引流技术[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008,2-31.
  • 6Koehler C, Niederbichler AD, Jung FJ, et al. Wound therapy using the vacuum - assisted closure device : clinical experience with novel indications [ J ]. J Trauma,2008,65 ( 3 ) :722 - 731.
  • 7Witkowski W, Jawien A, Witkiewicz W, et al. Initial multi-centre observations upon the effect of a new Topical Negative Pressure device upon patient and clinician experience and the treatment of wounds [J]. Int Wound J,2009,6(2) :167 - 174.
  • 8Vig S. A systematic review of topical negative pressure therapy for acute and chronic wounds [ J ]. Br J Surg,2008,95 (9) :685 - 692.
  • 9Bovill E, Banwell PE, Teot L, et al. Topical negative pressure wound therapy:a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds [ J ]. Int Wound J,2008,5 (4) :511 - 529.
  • 10Wagner A. Use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the conditioning of soft-tissue defects [ J ]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2008,20 (6) : 525 - 533.

共引文献246

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部