摘要
孙康宜和宇文所安主编的《剑桥中国文学史》采用"文学文化史"的编写理念,其创新性和启迪性基本得到学术界的肯定,但对这一理念在该著中的具体呈现,学者们却指出了不少问题,包括编写体例、内容和语言表述三个层面。这些问题提示了有待进一步思考和探讨的文学史书写问题。
Based on the writing idea of“a history of literary culture”,the innovation and enlightenment of The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature by Kang-yi Sun and Stephen Owen were largely affirmed in the academic circle.However,scholars have pointed out some imperfections of the book with respect to the embodiment of the idea,including stylistic rules,content and language expression.Those imperfections raise some issues with respect to the writing of literary history.
作者
谭清
TAN Qing(Department of Chinese Language & Literature, Xinhua College of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510520, China)
出处
《唐山师范学院学报》
2017年第6期61-65,共5页
Journal of Tangshan Normal University
关键词
《剑桥中国文学史》
文学文化史
编写体例
物质文化
女性文学
去经典化
The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature
a history of literary culture
stylistic rules
material culture
feminist literature
decanonization