期刊文献+

基于语义模型的实时数据有效性保证策略研究

Validity Protection Strategy for Real Time Data in CPS Based on Semantics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实时数据的有效性与CPU处理能力是信息物理融合系统(CPS)中的一对矛盾,提高采样频率可以保证实时数据的有效性,但是会增加CPU负荷,降低系统的计算能力。首先,利用实时数据的语义特点建立数据的有效性模型;然后,通过在CPU空闲期间设置预调度任务,合理地利用数据有效性模型,设置新的有效性间隔和实时数据的更新事务的开始时间,减少CPU执行时间;最后,在棉花采摘锭的自转、公转及油压等参数上,对基于语义模型的实时数据有效性保证策略进行了系统的评价,结果表明所提方法能够减少15%左右的CPU负荷。 The validity of real time data and CPU processing capability is a contradiction in the cyber physical system(CPS).While increasing the sampling frequency can guarantee the validity of the real time data,it can also increase the CPU workloads and reduce the system's computing power.Firstly,this paper used the semantic features of real timedata to establish the validity model of the data.Then,by setting the pre-scheduling task during the idle period of the CPU,making good using of the data validity model,setting the new validity interval and the start time of the updatetransaction of the real time data,the CPU execution time was reduced.Finally,the strategy based on semantic modelwas evaluated systematically on the parameters such as rotation,revolution and oil pressure of cotton picking ingot.The CPU load can be reduced by about15%.
作者 汤小春 田凯飞 TANG Xiao-chun;TIAN Kai-fei(School of Computer Science,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi' an710072 ,China)
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第12期11-16,22,共7页 Computer Science
基金 中国科技部国家重点研发计划(2016YFB1000700)资助
关键词 实时数据 语义模型 有效性保证 信息物理融合系统 Real time data Semantics model Validity protection Cyber physical system
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1STANKOVIC J A, SON S, HANSSON J. Misconception about real-time databases [J]. Computer, 1999, 32(6): 29-36.
  • 2XIONG Ming, HAN Song, LAM Kam-yiu, CHEN De-ji. Deferrable scheduling for maintaining real-time data freshness: Algorithms, analysis, and results [J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2008, 57(7): 952-964.
  • 3AMIRIJOO M, HANSSON J, SON S H. Specification and management of QoS in real-time databases supporting imprecise computations [J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2006, 55(3): 304-319.
  • 4XIONG Ming, SIVASANKARAN R, STANKOVIC J A, K, TOWSLEY D. Scheduling transactions with temporal constraints: exploiting data semantics [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2002, 14(5): 1155-1166.
  • 5KANG K D, SON S H, STANKOVIC J A. Managing deadline miss ratio and sensor data freshness in real-time databases [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2004, 16(10): 1200-1216.
  • 6SONG Xiao-hui, LIU J W S. Maintaining temporal consistency: Pessimistic versus optimistic concurrency control [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , 1995, 7(5): 786-796.
  • 7GUSTAFSSON T, HANSSON J. Dynamic on-demand updating of data in real-time database systems [C]// Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. New York: ACM, 2004: 846-853.
  • 8LUNDBERG L. Utilization based schedulability bounds for age constraint process sets in real-time system [J]. Real-Time Systems, 2002, 23(3): 273-295.
  • 9XIONG Ming, LIANG Bi-yu, LAM Kam-Yiu, GUO Yang. Quality of service guarantee for temporal consistency of real-time transactions [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2006, 18(8): 1097-1110.
  • 10XIONG Ming, RAMAMRITHAM K. Deriving deadlines and periods for real-time update transactions [J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2004, 53(5): 567-583.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部