期刊文献+

论撤销父母监护资格理由转变的科学性 被引量:3

The Rationality of Changing the Legal Reasons for the Deprivation of Parental Custody in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国司法实践中,撤销父母监护资格的案例近几年屡屡发生,法律以及相关司法解释对监护资格的撤销也有较为详细的规定。备受瞩目与期待的《民法总则》第36条对监护资格撤销理由作了从严的规定,既彰显国家对未成年人保护的力度,又体现对家庭完整与隐私的尊重。因为在家庭这一典型的私领域,父母基于人伦天性,对未成年人之照顾在法律上应推定符合未成年人之最佳利益,相应其监护资格不容轻易被撤销。即撤销父母监护资格的法定理由具有从严的必要性,而域外立法的共性也是如此。此外,撤销父母监护资格会产生诸多危害,所以我国转变撤销父母监护资格的理由具有科学性。 In China's recent judicial practice,there are many cases of the deprivation of parental custody.Related laws and judicial interpretations have made detailed regulations on the deprivation of parental custody.Article36of the General Rules of Civil Law,which was paid high attention and expectation,strictly stipulates the reasons of the deprivation of parental custody.It shows the state’s efforts to protect the juveniles and to respect family integrity and privacy.In private areas like the family,parents should be presumed to conform to the best interests of minors due to their human nature.As such,their parental custody should not be deprived easily.It’s necessary to take the strict reasons for the deprivation of parental custody,so is the commonality of extraterritorial legislation.Besides the deprivation of parental custody can cause a lot of harm.So it’s scientific to change the reasons for the deprivation of parental custody in our country.
作者 吕春娟 马璇 Lv Chun-juan;Ma Xuan
机构地区 兰州财经大学
出处 《苏州大学学报(法学版)》 2018年第1期9-17,共9页 Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地(国家人权教育与培训基地)"以保障儿童人权为导向建构国家监护制度研究"(项目编号:14JJD820017)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 监护资格撤销 法定理由 严格 科学性 Deprivation of Parental Custody the legal reason Stringent Rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献48

  • 1陈敏.浅谈婚姻家庭案件的特点及审理[J].法学评论,1997,15(5):83-89. 被引量:10
  • 2D. Szymczak, "La competence consultative de la Cour Europeenne des Droit de l'Homme", in A. Ondoua, D. Szymczak (cur.), Lafonctioa consultative des juridictions internationales, Paris, Pedone, 2009, p. 89.
  • 3JP Costa, P. Titun, "Les avis consultatifs devant la Cour Europeenne des Droits de l'Homme", in JF. Akandjil-Kombe ( cur), L'Homme dans le societe internationale : melanges en hommage au professeur Paul Tavernier, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2013, p. 605.
  • 4A. Drzemczewski, Advisory jurisdiction of the European Human Rights Court: A Procedure Worth Retaining, in AA. VV., The Modern World of Human Rights-E1 Mundo Moderno de los Derechos Humanos. Essay in Honour of Thomas Buergenthal-Ensayos en Honors de Thomas Buergenthal, San Jose, 1996, p. 493.
  • 5Report of the Group of Wise Person to the Committee of Ministers, CM (2006) 203, 15-11-2006, para. 76 -86.
  • 6ECHR, High Level Conference on the Future of European Court of Human Rights-Izmir Declaration, 26 e 27-4-2011.
  • 7ECHR, High Level Conference on the Future of European Court of Human Rights-Brighton Declaration, 20-4- 2012.
  • 8ECHR, Opinion of the Court on Draft Protocol No. 16 to the Convention extending its competence to give advisory opinions on the interpretation of the Convention, 6-5-2013.
  • 9ECHR, Reflection Paper on the Proposal to Extend the Court Advisory Jurisdiction, n. 3853038, 9-3-2013.
  • 10Coucil of Europe, Protocol No. 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Rights, Explanatory Report, para 1 -6.

共引文献10

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部