期刊文献+

腹腔镜与小切口手术切除胆囊治疗胆结石的临床疗效对比评价 被引量:6

Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic and mini-incision cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallstones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与小切口手术胆囊切除术(MC)治疗胆结石的临床效果。方法选择本院收治的116例胆结石患者,以简单随机法分为MC组和LC组,各58例。MC组采取MC治疗,LC组采取LC治疗,对两组临床效果进行观察对比。结果 LC组治疗总有效率、失血量、手术时间及肛门排气时间均明显优于MC组(P<0.05)。术后两组患者IgM、IgA、IgG水平均低于术前,且LC组上述指标均高于MC组(P<0.05)。LC组并发症总发生率及复发率均低于MC组(P<0.05)。结论在胆结石患者临床治疗中,LC更具有微创优势,可降低手术风险,且术后并发症少。 Objective Toinvestigatetheclinicaleffectoflaparoscopiccholecystectomy(LC)andmini-incisioncholecystectomy(MC)in the treatment of gallstones.Methods A total of116patients with gallstones treated in our hospital were divided intoMC and LC group with simple random method,with58cases in each group.The MC group took the MC treatment,the LC group adopted LC treatment.The treatment effects of two groups were observed and compared.Results The total effective rate,blood loss,operation time and anal exhaust time in the LC group were significantly better than those of the MC group(P<0.05).The levels of IgM,IgA and IgG in the two groups were lower than those before operation,and the above indexes in the LC group were higher than those of the MC group(P<0.05).The total complication rate and recurrence rate in the LC group were lower than those in the MC group(P<0.05).Conclusion In the clinical treatment of gallstone patients,LC has more minimally invasive advantages,which can reduce the surgical risk,with less postoperative complications.
作者 高军锋 GAO Jun-feng(Chencang Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji 721300, China3)
机构地区 宝鸡市陈仓医院
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2018年第6期74-75,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 腹腔镜 小切口手术 胆囊切除 胆结石 laparoscopy mini-incision surgery cholecystectomy gallstones
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1程建国,霞明,文峰,黄继征,朱杰伦,章涛.内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石合并胆管结石临床分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(7):2110-2112. 被引量:16
  • 2陈剑,韦军民.术中微切开胆道镜检查的可行性研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2005,11(6):372-374. 被引量:35
  • 3张启瑜,钱礼.腹部外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.
  • 4Wu XS, Shi LB, Gu J, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecys- tectomy versus multi-incision laparoscopie cholecystectomy:a meta- analysis of randomized clinical trials [ J]. J Laparoendoscopic Ad- vanced Surgical Techniques,2013,23 ( 3 ) : 183 - 191.
  • 5毕洁亮,张卫华.通腑泻热灌肠合剂促进腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胃肠功能恢复的临床观察[c].中华中医药学会外科分会、山东中医药学会外科专业委员会2008年中医外科学术年会论文集,2008:294-296.
  • 6Ikeda N,Ueno M,Kanamura T,et al. Safety and feasibility for sin- gle-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospi- tal: A retrospective comparison with conventional 4 - port laparo- scopic cholecystectomy [ J ]. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Sechniques,2013,23 ( 1 ) :33 - 36.
  • 7高志强.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术85例临床分析[C].第四届中国武汉国际微创外科学术研讨会论文集,2009:245-247.
  • 8Reibetanz J, Kim M, Germcr CT, ct al. Single-port Laparoscopic C- holecystectomy in Patients of Advanced Age: Why Not[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tcch,2012,22(4) :361 -363.
  • 9Kenny R, Richardson J, McGlone ER, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus pre or post-operative ercp for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing eholecystectomy is there any difference? [J]. Int J Surg, 2014,12(9) :989-993.
  • 10Alexakis N, Connor S. Meta-analysis of one-vs, two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2012,14(4) :254-259.

共引文献282

同被引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部