期刊文献+

景观评价研究进展 被引量:26

Research Progress of Landscape Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章回顾了景观评价发展过程,阐述了景观评价四大学派的理论基础、基本理论、评价方法和模式及优缺点。同时,依据评价侧重点的不同,将3大类型的评价方法特色总结为:一是侧重于对"景"的研究评价,称为详细描述法或专家法;二是侧重于"观"的研究评价,称为公众偏好法或居民参与法;三是"景"、"观"两者并重,称为量化综合法。从国家政策支持、理论引进与创新及国内评价实例等方面梳理了国内景观评价的探索历程。 The theoretical basis,evaluation methods and advantages and disadvantages of four main theoretical schools were discussed in this paper based on a conclusion of development of landscape evaluation.At the same time,according to the evaluation of the different emphasis,the characteristics of3types of evaluation methods were concluded as follows:type1focused on the evaluation of the"scenery",called a detailed description method or expert method;type2focused on the research of"feel",called the public preference or participation of residents;type3focused on"scenery"and"feel",called comprehensive quantitative method.From the aspects of national policy support,theoretical introduction and innovation,and domestic evaluation examples,this paper combined the exploration course of domestic landscape evaluation,and provided a reference for the establishment of landscape evaluation system and evaluation practice for the future.
作者 杨洋 黄少伟 唐洪辉 YANG Yang;HUANG Shaowei;TANG Honghui(Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization/Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou,Guangdong 510520, China;College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou,Guangdong 510642, China)
出处 《林业与环境科学》 2018年第1期116-122,共7页 Forestry and Environmental Science
基金 林业公益性行业科研专项"美丽城镇森林景观的构建技术研究与示范"(201404301)
关键词 景观评价 理论学派 评价方法 landscape evaluation theoretical school evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

二级参考文献267

共引文献1143

同被引文献379

引证文献26

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部