人工智能生成成果的法权化路径

The Legal Protection Mode of Artificial Intelligence Generated-results

受制于独创性要求,人工智能生成成果无法构成著作权法意义上的"作品"。通过分析人工智能生成成果的客体属性,衡量不同保护模式的利弊,文章认为邻接权路径或可成为其法权化的最优选择。在邻接权权利制度构建中,应当明确人工智能生成成果归属于对成果创作与传播进行必要安排者,其权利内容包括复制、发行、信息网络传播等所有著作财产权,可赋予其二十年的保护期限,以最大限度地平衡人工智能程序开发者、实际操作者和社会公众之间的利益。

Subject to the current standard of originality,the artificial intelligence generated-results cannot meet the requirements of"work"in the sense of copyright law.Considering the object attributes of artificial intelligence generated-results,and judging the pros and cons of different protection models,neighboring right protection mode can be the best choice for its legal protection.In the construction of the neighboring rights system,the right should belong to the people that actually control the artificial intelligence result,which includes reproduction rights,distribution rights and the right to network dissemination of information,etc..In order to maximize the balance between the artificial intelligence program developer,the actual operator and the public interests,the protection period of artificial intelligence generated-results should be twenty years.